On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Pascal Quantin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2014-07-03 19:26 GMT+02:00 Graham Bloice <[email protected]>:
>
>> On 3 July 2014 18:20, Alexis La Goutte <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm OK to backport this serie of patch to 1.12
>>>
>>> Other core ?
And about SSL Patches ?
>>>
>>> I want also try to also add to backport 1.12 change about HTTP2
>>> (include nghttp2 lib)
>>>
>>
>> I wouldn't like to backport nghttp2 until we get the build for that
>> cleaned up.  I have the change for that ready to go, just awaiting your
>> updates to the library itself.  Doesn't git cope with moves though, so you
>> should be OK if I make my change first?  The only thing I haven't checked is
>> dist building stuff, in case that needs to know the files have moved.
>
It is good now for nghttp2 lib (only waiting windows build...)
>
> Moreover backporting nghttp2 without merging first
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/2616/ does not make sense to me.
> My feeling is that http2 being still a moving draft, whatever lands in 1.12
> will be obsolete really fast...
>
> Pascal.
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to