Hi Guy The answer is yes. I live in italy, but I use linux in english. I switch to en or it for the specific purpose of the moment. With auto-detect I could't do that. For my daily use I switch to EN. To develop/test wireshark italian translation I switch to IT.
I don't know if this scenario applies to others, but for me getting rid of a functionality that is still in place is not a good approach. Have a nice day. Dario. On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > I.e., are there reasons, on any platforms, to set the Language preference > to anything other than Auto-Detect? As far as I know, on all supported > platforms (Windows, OS X, UN*Xes other than OS X) the Qt system locale gets > the locale information from the appropriate place on the OS. Is there ever > a need to override your global language setting? > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
