Hello Martin, On 2017-03-17, at 16:22 , Martin Kaiser <[email protected]> wrote:
> [...] > good to see you again. We worked together in the DVC-CI+ group back in > 2014. Good seeing you again! I believe to remember it was the meeting in Munich? > I hope that I told you about Wireshark's CI+ dissector then ;-) Yu did indeed. ;) > [...] > There's no such thing as a "high-level introduction to the DVB-related > functionality" document. Which I hadn't expected anyway. > There is, however, doc/README.dissector, which is worth a read. I'm studying this at the moment. But there's always the moment when you're convinced you had followed all instructions meticulously, but it still won't work. That's when a little hint from a more experienced developer comes handy. >> (1) A little bit of streamlining of how DVB PSI/SI is presented when >> analysing MPEG2-TS. I could e.g. imagine it to help readability if the >> PID were shown in the source and/or destination address field. Also, >> when interpreting DVB PSI/SI tables, some interpretations of >> identifiers doesn't seem to be quite accurate. > > That sounds like a good starting point: Find a field that we don't > interpret correctly. Try to find out where it's defined and modify it. > Try to come up with a small and simple modification for the first patch. > If you get stuck along the way, let me know which field you're looking > at and prepare a ts file that you can share with us. > [...] Sounds like a plan. My first patch should be... posted here? Many thanks and looking forward to your thoughts, --alexander ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
