So if I add code to TRANSUM so that it only registers itself when running with Wireshark, would that be acceptable as a fix pending the redesign and recoding as you have described below?
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Guy Harris Sent: 09 April 2017 21:01 To: Developer support list for Wireshark <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Inconsistent availability of proto_tree values during the first of two passes On Apr 9, 2017, at 12:48 PM, Paul Offord <[email protected]> wrote: > As making the code consistent has been rejected and the tap idea won’t work, > where do we go from here? As somebody said: > We might also want a way to have taps/"post-"dissectors that act as > extensions to particular protocol dissectors - that might be what TRANSUM, > and possibly MATE, *really* want to be.) and as somebody said in https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201702/msg00082.html > Alternatively, we could have a set of flags used when post-dissectors are > registered, including "this post-dissector needs a protocol tree", and, if > there are any active post-dissectors that require a protocol tree, one will > be generated. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe ______________________________________________________________________ This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Advance Seven Ltd. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. Advance Seven Ltd. Registered in England & Wales numbered 2373877 at Endeavour House, Coopers End Lane, Stansted, Essex CM24 1SJ ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
