On Apr 30, 2017, at 6:22 PM, Jeff Morriss <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 04/30/2017 12:34 PM, Guy Harris wrote: >> On Apr 30, 2017, at 3:26 AM, Peter Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> For the Debian (and Cygwin/Windows) setup, installation of said file is >>> specified (see for example the file list in the suggested package: >>> https://packages.debian.org/jessie/all/docbook-xml/filelist). >>> >>> If this is missing in the macOS instructions, then that needs fixing. >> And what about Red Hat, Solaris, AIX, HP-UX, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, >> DragonFly BSD, Joe Bob's Shiny New Linux, etc., etc., etc.? >> Documenting this on a platform-by-platform basis isn't the right answer. > > On RedHat/Fedora asciidoc depends on docbook-style-xsl which provides the > files in question. > > I guess that either the former doesn't always require the latter or, on some > systems, the dependencies are broken (or the packaging system in question > doesn't support dependencies--do any of those exist any more?). ...or there *is* no built-in packaging system. There is none in macOS, and not everybody has installed any of the third-party packaging systems; we don't require them. Oracle provides a packaging system for Solaris 11, but older versions don't have it. HP-UX doesn't have one, as far as I know; the best you have is the HP-UX Porting and Archive Centre. AIX doesn't have one, either, as far as I know. The *BSDs have "ports"/"packages" and the like. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
