There is general support for dropping autotools on master (after fixing the rpm build).
But I'll rewrite the patches for 2.4 and 2.6 to add a compile switch, so that the patch only applies if it is build with cmake. Adding Objective-C builds to auto tools seems pointless at this point, to me at least. regards Roland On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Apr 9, 2018, at 8:44 AM, Wireshark code review < > code-review-do-not-re...@wireshark.org> wrote: > > > URL: https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git; > a=commit;h=d347091da962a3bb095c62339fc6faa07d189a9f > > Submitter: Roland Knall (rkn...@gmail.com) > > Changed: branch: master > > Repository: wireshark > > > > Commits: > > > > d347091 by Roland Knall (rkn...@gmail.com): > > > > Qt: Fix MacOSX menu entries > > This doesn't built with autotools. > > Autotools already has problems with Qt on macOS, and I think there was > some talk about abandoning autotools support in 3.0; is it time to get rid > of autotools support, at least in the master branch, in general, or even > just on macOS (there's no Windows autotools support to get rid of)? > ____________________________________________________________ > _______________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject= > unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
