> Instead of dedicating a bit to the enterprise flag, we could also > define a specific tag for the IANA-PEN, then the enterprise number > itself followed by its private payload. This way we keep the full > range of value tags at the cost of 2 extra bytes per packet.
Thank you, Pascal, for the suggestion, it is a huge improvement on my previous proposal. > Not against the suggestion per se but isn't it better that you write > an MR including the new tags you need so that Wireshark can read your > files? Yes, Anders, it is better. Today, I am only interested in adding the ECGI (E-UTRAN Cell Global Identifier), but reserving it a whole tag sounds a little shortsighted. I am thinking about an "LTE identities" tag with a dynamic structure inside, and I wonder: what is your opinion on nesting TLV structures? Regards, Mauro ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
