Le jeu. 20 juin 2024 à 12:16, Anders Broman <a.broma...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> My first thought would be to keep it simple and use a tag per address. > Plenty of tag namespace. > Could we use a single tag for 3GPP global cell identifier, and then 1 byte for the cell identity type followed by the identity itself? This way we could have a single tag for CGI, ECGI, NCGI, etc. > Den tors 20 juni 2024 11:35Mauro Levra <mauro.le...@viavisolutions.com> > skrev: > >> > Instead of dedicating a bit to the enterprise flag, we could also >> > define a specific tag for the IANA-PEN, then the enterprise number >> > itself followed by its private payload. This way we keep the full >> > range of value tags at the cost of 2 extra bytes per packet. >> >> Thank you, Pascal, for the suggestion, it is a huge improvement on my >> previous proposal. >> >> > Not against the suggestion per se but isn't it better that you write >> > an MR including the new tags you need so that Wireshark can read your >> > files? >> >> Yes, Anders, it is better. >> Today, I am only interested in adding the ECGI (E-UTRAN Cell Global >> Identifier), but reserving it a whole tag sounds a little shortsighted. >> I am thinking about an "LTE identities" tag with a dynamic structure >> inside, and I wonder: what is your opinion on nesting TLV structures? >> >> Regards, >> >> Mauro > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
