My receiver computer is running under windows and the one transmitting the
video is running under linux.....How can i do this in this case???

On 13/03/2008, Rob MacKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  I looked at re-writing ping once to test time difference…  IF your
> endpoints are in the same building, consider running a wire between the
> parallel ports and code something to check the exact time when you flip a
> switch or something.  Then you would have a trigger time for both.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Martin Mathieson
> *Sent:* March 13, 2008 12:13 PM
> *To:* Community support list for Wireshark
> *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation
>
>
>
> If you have console / command prompt of some type, most operating systems
> have a ping command that uses ICMP to test connectivity and routrip delay to
> a remote host and back.
> But I don't know what OS or environment is running on your endpoints.
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Fabiana moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> how can do the ping? I dont know what this is
>
>
>
> On 13/03/2008, *Martin Mathieson* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> You could of course do a ping.  And see how close to the middle the far
> side sees something happen...
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Fabiana moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> Well i did this...but i dont know if it's ideal...i think it would work
> though....
>
> I synchronized the two computers to a server on the internet before every
> capture so both have the exact same time.
>
> i have my sniffer in the two computers, the one that sends and the ones
> that receive.
>
> I created a function in matlab that calculates the difference between
> those two times...
>
> I am being really carefull when i have a packet lost or things like
> that....
>
> But probably this can work???? ...
>
>
>
> On 13/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Fabiana,
>
>
>
> the only way to do that is if you know the time difference between the
> machines.
>
> It´s not so easy however if you use windows you could try synchronizing
> both endpoints by using:
>
> w32tm /config /manualpeerlist:[IP to synchronize to] /update
> /syncfromflags:MANUAL
>
>
>
> and then monitor the time difference with:
>
> w32tm /stripchart /computer:[IP to synchronize to]
>
>
>
> ,you always can have a delay reference by pinging and dividing by 2 the
> RTT.
>
>
>
> HTH
>
> Juan
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *ext Fabiana moreno
> *Sent:* Miércoles, 12 de Marzo de 2008 09:38 a.m.
> *To:* Community support list for Wireshark
> *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation
>
> so ... it is not reliable if i substract the time i hav in the client
> minus the time i have in the server to get my end the end delay?
>
> On 12/03/2008, *Hansang Bae* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fabiana moreno wrote:
> > Hello there,
> >
> > I know wireshark is not able to calculate the end-to-end delay of a
> > packet when streaming. I was just wondering if adjusting the clocks of
> > my two computers(sender and receiver) to the network time protocol and
> > having the sniffer at both ends i could calculate the end-to-end-delay
> > tracing each packet. Does this sound logical?
> >
>
>
> It is within the limits of ntp.  Unless there is a WAN involved, the
> packets are flying around at an order of magnitude faster than what ntp
> can provide (ms resolution)
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
> Hansang
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your
> system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users

Reply via email to