Thanks to everyone. I should have know that. Made the change. Looks like my
mind was somewhere lese 128 times.

Thanks to the find and replace it only took a few seconds.

on 5/10/02 8:03 AM, Jon Grieve at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Dan,
> 
> The only difference is that one equates to the 'magic number' generated by
> Witango - and you must manually include the "_userReference=" Search
> Argument - while the other automatically includes this Search Argument.
> 
> Put another way, you either use:
> 
> <a href="<@CGI><@APPFILE>?_userReference=<@USERREFERENCE>"></a>
> 
> ...or...
> 
> <a href="<@CGI><@APPFILE>?<@USERREFERENCEARGUMENT>"></a>
> 
> ...the result is the same.
> 
> To prove that, create a TAF/TML as below:
> 
> <html>
> <head><title>Testing</title></head>
> <body>
> <@LITERAL '<@USERREFERENCE>'> = &quot;<@USERREFERENCE>&quot;
> <br><br>
> <@LITERAL '<@USERREFERENCEARGUMENT>'> = &quot;<@USERREFERENCEARGUMENT>&quot;
> </body>
> </html>
> 
> So, you should be able to use either - and it shouldn't make any difference
> which you choose.  You can, for example, use both in a project, provided you
> remember to include the Search Argument where relevant.
> 
> My guess as to why both exist is simply that the <@...ARGUMENT> was added at
> a later date to reduce code clutter - if you have to manually type the
> Search Argument on every hyperlink, and it has to be the same name every
> time, why bother to re-type it?!
> 
> Put another way, I'd suggest that the <@...ARGUMENT> one is best, but the
> pure version remains for backward compatibility.
> 
> Jon
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 May 2002 12:03
> To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> Subject: Witango-Talk: Silly Userreferance argument
> 
> 
> Seems I have sometimes used Userreference and sometimes userreferance
> argument in my growing application.
> 
> I would think it is important to be consistent and use one or the other but
> not both.
> 
> I had at least one incident where clicking on a links where they were
> different ended up bring up someone else's information.
> 
> So which is best to use or are their times when one is needed instead of the
> other?
> 
> Should I change them all to one or the other?
> 
> Why do we have both?
> 
> Dan

-- 
Dan Stein
Digital Software Solutions
799 Evergreen Circle
Telford PA 18969
215-799-0192
610-256-2843
Fax 413-410-9682
FMP,Tango, EDI,SQL 7
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.dss-db.com


________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body

Reply via email to