Hi Ian,
I use zoneedit.com and have found the service and support to be good.
advantages are:
- dns redundancy
- dynamic ip addressing
- round robin dns
- mail forwarding / web forwarding / cloaking
- they use ip blacklists for reduction of spam (when using their mail 
forwarding feature)
- fast and immediate
there are other features that they provide that I don't use yet.

disadvantages
- they use ip blacklists for reduction of spam (when using their mail 
forwarding feature) which causes clients using ip addresses which are 
blacklisted to be unable to get mail through their mail server. however, I 
have only had a few cases of this and encouraged the client to bug their 
ISP to fix the security hole on the blacklisted server and remove it from 
the list. Providing the client with an email/web page which points out what 
the problem is, who should solve it and how it should be solved seems to be 
the best trick - I present it as a service to my clients and for them to 
use with their clients.

service is free for first 5 domains/services per client - they currently 
host over 500,000 domains
definitely worth checking it out
Garth


At 10:31  17/07/02 -0700, you wrote:
>I am considering outsourcing our DNS service and am wondering if there are 
>recommendations that anyone would share.
>
>I have looked at ultradns.com  ... I'm wondering if there are others out 
>there that listers have experience with.  Please share pro's and con's.
>
>with thanks ...
>
>Ian Daniel, A.Sc.T.,     President
>New Creation Consulting & Information Management Inc.
># 701,  889 West Pender Street, Vancouver, BC  V6C 3B2  Canada
>=====================================================
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]            http://www.ncol.com 
><http://witango.ncol.com>http://witango.ncol.com
>Ph: (604) 576-3086    Fax: (604) 576-3025
>

________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body

Reply via email to