This may be true, but this is not the problem. The problem is when you
need to access the row of the outer loop, from within the inner loop:
This would not work:
<@for start=1 stop=100>
Outer loop row is <@currow>
<@for start=500 stop=600>
Inner loop is <@currow>
Outerloop is <@currow>
</@for>
</@for>
This would:
<@for start=1 stop=100>
Outer loop row is <@currow>
<@assign local$outerRow <@currow>>
<@for start=500 stop=600>
Inner loop is <@currow>
Outerloop is @@local$outerRow
</@for>
</@for>
Make sense?
Robert.
On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 04:35 PM, Thomas Ferguson wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I am going to go against all the replies to this
> thread and say yes you can depend on Witango to keep
> track of both instances of <@currow>.
>
> I was pleasantly surprised before when I found that
> you could with <@rows> and I have checked it with
> <@for> just now....
>
> Paste the following into a results:
>
> <@FOR START="1" STEP="1" STOP="5">
>
> <b>This is the outer for loop and currow is
> <@currow></b><br>
> <@FOR START="1" STEP="1" STOP="10">
> This is in the inner loop and currow is
> <@currow><br>
> </@FOR>
> </@FOR>
--
Robert Garcia
BigHead Technology
2781 N Carlmont Pl
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Phone 805.522.8577
http://www.bighead.net/
http://www.theradmac.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
