Thanks for the responses, but so far they have really only muddied the
water.

I'm not interested in the stats, ethics, or efficiency of this practice. I'm
not even sure if it is any benefit to the particular task at hand. It's more
of a mountain that I intend to climb because it's there.

What I've discovered so far is that references to attached images in HTML
emails are of the form <img src="cid:image.gif";> but image.gif is not the
name of the image (although it could be) but is the Content ID.

In Perl and PHP solutions you specify a Content ID for each graphic, then
call this ID in the HTML. So if you had an image called 'image.gif' you
would specify that it's CID is 'image.gif' (or ABC or whatever) and then
refer to it in the HTML as <img src="cid:image.gif";> (or <img
src="cid:ABC";>).

Unforunately the Tango Mail action doesn't provide a CID specification field
for attached items.

So is anyone actually doing this? If so, how? With a fourth party email app
perhaps? No reason why Tango couldn't pass the info to a CGI that does
support Content ID specification.

Wayne Irvine

                  Byte Services Pty Ltd
               http://www.byteserve.com.au/
                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Ph 02 9960 6099   Mob 0409 960 609   Fax 02 9960 6088

________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body

Reply via email to