Does anyone have Rodney Barton's phone #?
If we all call, maybe he can get the system admin to disable Dr. Sim's
email!
Mark Bushaw

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Multiple recipients of list witango-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 7:59 AM
Subject: RE: Witango-Talk - witango-talk Digest - V01 #882 ( -Reply)


> Am I to assume that I'll get this every 5 minutes until this idiot returns
> to work?  Goes to show that a PhD ain't what it used to be.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Sims
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:48 AM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > Subject: Witango-Talk - witango-talk Digest - V01 #882 ( -Reply)
> >
> >
> > This is an automatic reply.
> >
> > I am out of the office from noon on 26 Nov 2002 until Monday, 2
> > Dec 2002.
> >
> > If you need immediate assistance, please call the Safety Office
> > at ext. 2697 and talk to Rodney Barton, Assistant Safety Officer.
> >  If Rodney is not in, leaving a message on our voice mail will
> > page Rodney.
> >
> > In an emergency, both Rodney Barton and Campus Police have my
> > cell phone number on file.
> >
> > Thanks and have a good holiday,
> >
> > James Sims, Ph.D., Safety Office
> >
> > >>> witango-talk 11/27/02 09:33 >>>
> >
> > witango-talk Digest    Thu, 28 Nov 2002 02:33:40 +1100   V01 #882
> >
> > Today's topics:
> >      'Witango-Talk - witango-talk Digest - V01 #881 ( -Reply)'
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:28:25 -0600
> > From: "James Sims" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Witango-Talk - witango-talk Digest - V01 #881 ( -Reply)
> >
> >
> > This is an automatic reply.
> >
> > I am out of the office from noon on 26 Nov 2002 until Monday, 2
> > Dec 2002. =
> > =20
> >
> > If you need immediate assistance, please call the Safety Office at ext.
=
> > 2697 and talk to Rodney Barton, Assistant Safety Officer.  If Rodney is
=
> > not in, leaving a message on our voice mail will page Rodney.=20
> >
> > In an emergency, both Rodney Barton and Campus Police have my cell phone
=
> > number on file.
> >
> > Thanks and have a good holiday,=20
> >
> > James Sims, Ph.D., Safety Office
> >
> > >>> witango-talk 11/27/02 09:19 >>>
> >
> > witango-talk Digest    Thu, 28 Nov 2002 02:19:00 +1100   V01 #881
> >
> > Today's topics:
> >      'Re: RE: Witango-Talk:  <@INCLUDE> problem'
> >      'Witango-Talk - witango-talk Digest - V01 #880 ( -Reply)'
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:19:46 -0600
> > From: "John McGowan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: RE: Witango-Talk:  <@INCLUDE> problem
> >
> >
> > don't put the @include tag in the iframe source... put the url of the
taf
> > that you want to populate that iframe...
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Wilcox, Jamileh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Multiple recipients of list witango-talk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 6:00 PM
> > Subject: RE: RE: Witango-Talk: <@INCLUDE> problem
> >
> >
> > That would explain it.  OK, back to the drawing board.
> >
> > Thanks!     j
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ben Johansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 5:51 PM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: <@INCLUDE> problem
> > >
> > >
> > > This is because the sub TAF (TAF Call in an @INCLUDE)
> > > reference is not processed as a TAF by the server. It is just
> > > passed through as XML inside. The original @INCLUDE
> > >
> > > Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com
> > > Authorized Witango Reseller http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm
> > > Latest downloads & List Archives @ http://www.witango.ws
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of Wilcox,
> > > Jamileh
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 3:04 PM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > Subject: Witango-Talk: <@INCLUDE> problem
> > >
> > > Is there a problem with using <@INCLUDE> with a TAF file?
> > >
> > > Or a problem with nesting <@INCLUDE> in an inline frame?
> > >
> > > If so, is there another method to use?
> > >
> > > I've got an entry page that uses an IFrame with a taf src
> > > file.  That src file has an <@INCLUDE> for another taf file.
> > >
> > > The browser shows the structure of the final taf file (i.e.,
> > > the If/Else statements, the Search statements, etc) rather
> > > than the correct output. There's also a couple of extra
> > > brackets thrown in for good measure (like
> > > so):  ]]>
> > >
> > > I've searched all 3 tafs for open brackets, open tags, etc.,
> > > without any luck, both looking through the tafs & using the
> > > View Source.  I've stripped all 3 tafs down to essentials
> > > (just HTML, HEAD, BODY, etc.) and still have the same problem
> > > (which seems to eliminate the open tags possibility).  I've
> > > created new copies of all 3 tafs.  Nothing seems to fix this,
> > > so I'm starting to wonder if I'm doing something that Witango
> > > just won't do.
> > >
> > > Any suggestions?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > jamileh
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > __________
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > __________
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:02:31 -0600
> > From: "James Sims" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Witango-Talk - witango-talk Digest - V01 #880 ( -Reply)
> >
> >
> > This is an automatic reply.
> >
> > I am out of the office from noon on 26 Nov 2002 until Monday, 2
> > Dec 2002. =
> > =3D
> > =3D20
> >
> > If you need immediate assistance, please call the Safety Office at ext.
=
> > =3D
> > 2697 and talk to Rodney Barton, Assistant Safety Officer.  If Rodney is
=
> > =3D
> > not in, leaving a message on our voice mail will page Rodney.=3D20
> >
> > In an emergency, both Rodney Barton and Campus Police have my cell phone
=
> > =3D
> > number on file.
> >
> > Thanks and have a good holiday,=3D20
> >
> > James Sims, Ph.D., Safety Office
> >
> > >>> witango-talk 11/27/02 07:02 >>>
> >
> > witango-talk Digest    Thu, 28 Nov 2002 00:02:00 +1100   V01 #880
> >
> > Today's topics:
> >      'RE: Witango-Talk:  Ping'
> >      'RE: Witango-Talk:  Ping'
> >      'RE:  RE: Witango-Talk:  Name Look Up'
> >      'RE:  RE: Witango-Talk:  Ping Rate-Off Topic'
> >      'Re: RE: Witango-Talk:  Name Look Up'
> >      'RE: RE: Witango-Talk:  Ping Rate-Off Topic'
> >      'Re: RE: Witango-Talk:  Ping Rate-Off Topic'
> >      'RE: RE: Witango-Talk:  Name Look Up'
> >      'Please Clarify'
> >      'Re: Witango-Talk:  Ping Rate-Off Topic'
> >      'OT - Happy Anniversary to Me'
> >      'RE: Witango-Talk:  Ping Rate-Off Topic'
> >      'RE:  RE: Witango-Talk:  Ping Rate-Off Topic'
> >      'RE: Witango-Talk:  Please Clarify'
> >      'RE:  Re: Witango-Talk:  Ping Rate-Off Topic'
> >      'Re: Witango-Talk: OT - Happy Anniversary to Me'
> >      'RE: Witango-Talk:  Ping Rate-Off Topic'
> >      'RE: Witango-Talk:  Please Clarify'
> >      '<@INCLUDE> problem'
> >      'RE: Witango-Talk:  <@INCLUDE> problem'
> >      'RE: Witango-Talk:  <@INCLUDE> problem'
> >      'RE:  RE: Witango-Talk:  <@INCLUDE> problem'
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:25:54 -0500
> > From: Web Dude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk:  Ping
> >
> >
> > Poing!
> >
> > >Pong!
> > >
> > >I was wondering if there was a problem too...
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Fogelson, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: 25 November 2002 22:46
> > >To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > >Subject: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > >
> > >
> > >My web services were down this weekend. Just wanted to make sure I
didn't
> > >get bounced from the list.
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >
> > >Steve Fogelson
> > >Internet Commerce Solutions
> >
>________________________________________________________________________
> > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
>________________________________________________________________________
> > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> >
> > --=3D20
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:37:12 -0800
> > From: "Ben Johansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk:  Ping
> >
> >
> > Who server is it now :-)
> >
> > Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com
> > Authorized Witango Reseller
http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm=3D20
> > Latest downloads & List Archives @ http://www.witango.ws
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Web Dude
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:26 AM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping
> >
> > Poing!
> >
> > >Pong!
> > >
> > >I was wondering if there was a problem too...
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Fogelson, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: 25 November 2002 22:46
> > >To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > >Subject: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > >
> > >
> > >My web services were down this weekend. Just wanted to make sure I
> > didn't
> > >get bounced from the list.
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >
> > >Steve Fogelson
> > >Internet Commerce Solutions
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > _
> > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > _
> > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> >
> > --=3D20
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:02:29 -0600
> > From: "Campbell, Steve V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE:  RE: Witango-Talk:  Name Look Up
> >
> >
> > One more that I forgot to add to that last mail
> > I am using an external to find out the machine name of the user.
> >
> > @@local$nslookup
> >
> > But for some reason it's not returning.  If I don't denoted the scope
> > would the command work like :
> >
> > @@nslookup
> >
> > ??
> >
> > thanks in advance
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 11:50:22 -0600
> > From: "Campbell, Steve V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE:  RE: Witango-Talk:  Ping Rate-Off Topic
> >
> >
> > Since this seems to be the topic at hand:
> >
> >
> > I created an application that goes out and runs a set of externals that
> > returns ping rates on IP's and Port Numbers. =3D3D20
> >
> > The hard part of this application I received help with from this list,
> > but, the last part of this application I have ran into a wall.
> >
> > I need to know where I can be "steered" out on the web to find out ping
> > rates and what is considered good, okay and bad.  I am trying to assign
> > different images to different ping rates, but, to be honest, I have no
> > idea what is considered good or bad AND, I don't even know where to
> > start on the web trying to find that information.
> >
> > Any knowledge in this area or help would be greatly appreciated!  Thank
> > you!
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ben Johansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=3D3D20
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:37 AM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping
> >
> > Who server is it now :-)
> >
> > Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com
> > Authorized Witango Reseller
> > http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm=3D3D2=
> > 0
> > Latest downloads & List Archives @ http://www.witango.ws
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Web Dude
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:26 AM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping
> >
> > Poing!
> >
> > >Pong!
> > >
> > >I was wondering if there was a problem too...
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Fogelson, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: 25 November 2002 22:46
> > >To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > >Subject: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > >
> > >
> > >My web services were down this weekend. Just wanted to make sure I
> > didn't
> > >get bounced from the list.
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >
> > >Steve Fogelson
> > >Internet Commerce Solutions
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > _
> > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > _
> > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> >
> > --=3D3D20
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:23:38 -0800
> > From: "Atrix Wolfe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: RE: Witango-Talk:  Name Look Up
> >
> >
> > thats because without using a scope i believe it defaults to user scope.
> > local scope is just like it implies...local and temporary.  user scope
> > sticks with the user until you change or purge it.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Campbell, Steve V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Multiple recipients of list witango-talk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:02 AM
> > Subject: RE: RE: Witango-Talk: Name Look Up
> >
> >
> > One more that I forgot to add to that last mail
> > I am using an external to find out the machine name of the user.
> >
> > @@local$nslookup
> >
> > But for some reason it's not returning.  If I don't denoted the scope
> > would the command work like :
> >
> > @@nslookup
> >
> > ??
> >
> > thanks in advance
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:25:29 -0500
> > From: "Tom Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: RE: Witango-Talk:  Ping Rate-Off Topic
> >
> >
> > you might find something useful and dslreports.com
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Campbell, Steve V.
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:50 PM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > Subject: RE: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping Rate-Off Topic
> > >=3D20
> > >=3D20
> > > Since this seems to be the topic at hand:
> > >=3D20
> > >=3D20
> > > I created an application that goes out and runs a set of externals
that
> > > returns ping rates on IP's and Port Numbers. =3D20
> > >=3D20
> > > The hard part of this application I received help with from this list,
> > > but, the last part of this application I have ran into a wall.
> > >=3D20
> > > I need to know where I can be "steered" out on the web to find out
ping
> > > rates and what is considered good, okay and bad.  I am trying to
assign
> > > different images to different ping rates, but, to be honest, I have no
> > > idea what is considered good or bad AND, I don't even know where to
> > > start on the web trying to find that information.
> > >=3D20
> > > Any knowledge in this area or help would be greatly appreciated!
Thank
> > > you!
> > >=3D20
> > > Steve
> > >=3D20
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ben Johansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=3D20
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:37 AM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > >=3D20
> > > Who server is it now :-)
> > >=3D20
> > > Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com
> > > Authorized Witango Reseller
> > http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm=3D2=
> > 0
> > > Latest downloads & List Archives @ http://www.witango.ws
> > >=3D20
> > >=3D20
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Web Dude
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:26 AM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > >=3D20
> > > Poing!
> > >=3D20
> > > >Pong!
> > > >
> > > >I was wondering if there was a problem too...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Fogelson, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > >Sent: 25 November 2002 22:46
> > > >To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > >Subject: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >My web services were down this weekend. Just wanted to make sure I
> > > didn't
> > > >get bounced from the list.
> > > >
> > > >Thanks
> > > >
> > > >Steve Fogelson
> > > >Internet Commerce Solutions
> > >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > > _
> > > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > > _
> > > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >=3D20
> > >=3D20
> > > --=3D20
> > >
________________________________________________________________________
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >=3D20
> > >
________________________________________________________________________
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >
________________________________________________________________________
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:30:51 -0800
> > From: "Atrix Wolfe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: RE: Witango-Talk:  Ping Rate-Off Topic
> >
> >
> > well if you think about it logicly...what do you consider good response
=
> > =3D
> > time
> > for a server?  If your at a web page and it opens up in half a second
(500
> > ms) thats pretty good isnt it?  2 seconds is kinda iffy and 5 seconds
and
> > above id say is kinda slow.  ::shrug:: :P
> >
> > another thing to consider with network speed besides ping is avaliable
> > bandwidth.  Im not sure how youd use this in your calculations or if you
> > even can very easily but if im a server with 1 megabyte per second with
3
> > users at 330k apeice (leaving aprox 10k bandwidth left) but have quad
xeon
> > processors...the ping reply is going to be fast since a ping is small
and
> > the processor isnt bogged down, but if someone tried to download a
larger
> > file from me, it would take a long time since there is only 10k/second
> > bandwidth left.
> >
> > Make sense?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Campbell, Steve V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Multiple recipients of list witango-talk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:50 AM
> > Subject: RE: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping Rate-Off Topic
> >
> >
> > Since this seems to be the topic at hand:
> >
> >
> > I created an application that goes out and runs a set of externals that
> > returns ping rates on IP's and Port Numbers.
> >
> > The hard part of this application I received help with from this list,
> > but, the last part of this application I have ran into a wall.
> >
> > I need to know where I can be "steered" out on the web to find out ping
> > rates and what is considered good, okay and bad.  I am trying to assign
> > different images to different ping rates, but, to be honest, I have no
> > idea what is considered good or bad AND, I don't even know where to
> > start on the web trying to find that information.
> >
> > Any knowledge in this area or help would be greatly appreciated!  Thank
> > you!
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ben Johansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:37 AM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping
> >
> > Who server is it now :-)
> >
> > Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com
> > Authorized Witango Reseller http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm
> > Latest downloads & List Archives @ http://www.witango.ws
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Web Dude
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:26 AM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping
> >
> > Poing!
> >
> > >Pong!
> > >
> > >I was wondering if there was a problem too...
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Fogelson, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: 25 November 2002 22:46
> > >To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > >Subject: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > >
> > >
> > >My web services were down this weekend. Just wanted to make sure I
> > didn't
> > >get bounced from the list.
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >
> > >Steve Fogelson
> > >Internet Commerce Solutions
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > _
> > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > _
> > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> >
> > --
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:32:27 -0800
> > From: "Ben Johansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: RE: Witango-Talk:  Name Look Up
> >
> >
> > Just a clarification, if you do not specify scope it defaults to the
> > "DEFAULTSCOPE=3D3D" that is defined in the T4SERVER.INI and new
> > WITANGO.INI=
> > .
> >
> > Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com
> > Authorized Witango Reseller
http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm=3D20
> > Latest downloads & List Archives @ http://www.witango.ws
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Atrix Wolfe
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:24 AM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > Subject: Re: RE: Witango-Talk: Name Look Up
> >
> > thats because without using a scope i believe it defaults to user scope.
> > local scope is just like it implies...local and temporary.  user scope
> > sticks with the user until you change or purge it.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Campbell, Steve V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Multiple recipients of list witango-talk"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:02 AM
> > Subject: RE: RE: Witango-Talk: Name Look Up
> >
> >
> > One more that I forgot to add to that last mail
> > I am using an external to find out the machine name of the user.
> >
> > @@local$nslookup
> >
> > But for some reason it's not returning.  If I don't denoted the scope
> > would the command work like :
> >
> > @@nslookup
> >
> > ??
> >
> > thanks in advance
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:40:27 -0500
> > From: "Steve Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Please Clarify
> >
> >
> > Now that one platform has left the version 5 Beta world, we've now got
> > readers who are using at least 3 different versions of Witango/Tango
(3.x,
> > 2000/4.x, and 5.x). Therefore it would help everyone if when you post to
=
> > =3D
> > the
> > list, you could provide some general information when asking a question.
I
> > was reading the reply that Atrix sent, which is correct if the product
is
> > Witango 4.x/2000 and earlier but is incorrect if you are using Witango
5.0
> > or greater.
> >
> > Please include version, platform, database, method of connection (ODBC,
> > iODBC, OCI, etc.) and any other details that would be relevant to your
> > question.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Steve Smith
> >
> > Oakbridge Information Solutions
> > Office: (519) 624-4388
> > GTA:    (416) 606-3885
> > Fax:    (519) 624-3353
> > Cell:   (416) 606-3885
> > Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Web:    http://www.oakbridge.ca
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:50:52 -0500
> > From: Robert Shubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Witango-Talk:  Ping Rate-Off Topic
> >
> >
> > It's something like this, in the internet:
> >
> > 1-10 ms (milliseconds): Excellent (typically local 10/100 network)
> > 11-50 ms: Typical for T1s, T3s, etc.
> > 51-100 ms: Typical for Frame Relay, DSL, ISDN etc.
> > 101-300 ms: Typical for 56K dial-up Modems
> > 301+ ms: getting bad, probably some congestion
> > 1000+ ms (1 second): horrible, mis-route or some other failure
> >
> > You should always do about 10 pings and get the average, since a packet
> > drop, a route build, or a collision can cause the occasional packet to
> > be hundreds of ms more than it should be.
> >
> > Robert Shubert
> > Tronics
> >
> > "Campbell, Steve V." wrote:
> > >=3D20
> > > Since this seems to be the topic at hand:
> > >=3D20
> > > I created an application that goes out and runs a set of externals
that
> > > returns ping rates on IP's and Port Numbers.
> > >=3D20
> > > The hard part of this application I received help with from this list,
> > > but, the last part of this application I have ran into a wall.
> > >=3D20
> > > I need to know where I can be "steered" out on the web to find out
ping
> > > rates and what is considered good, okay and bad.  I am trying to
assign
> > > different images to different ping rates, but, to be honest, I have no
> > > idea what is considered good or bad AND, I don't even know where to
> > > start on the web trying to find that information.
> > >=3D20
> > > Any knowledge in this area or help would be greatly appreciated!
Thank
> > > you!
> > >=3D20
> > > Steve
> > >=3D20
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ben Johansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:37 AM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > >=3D20
> > > Who server is it now :-)
> > >=3D20
> > > Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com
> > > Authorized Witango Reseller http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm
> > > Latest downloads & List Archives @ http://www.witango.ws
> > >=3D20
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Web Dude
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:26 AM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > >=3D20
> > > Poing!
> > >=3D20
> > > >Pong!
> > > >
> > > >I was wondering if there was a problem too...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Fogelson, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > >Sent: 25 November 2002 22:46
> > > >To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > >Subject: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >My web services were down this weekend. Just wanted to make sure I
> > > didn't
> > > >get bounced from the list.
> > > >
> > > >Thanks
> > > >
> > > >Steve Fogelson
> > > >Internet Commerce Solutions
> > >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > > _
> > > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > > _
> > > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >=3D20
> > > --
> > >
________________________________________________________________________
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >=3D20
> > >
________________________________________________________________________
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >
________________________________________________________________________
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:51:22 -0500
> > From: "Steve Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: OT - Happy Anniversary to Me
> >
> >
> > I'm not sure why I remember this kind of useless trivia, but if my
memory
> > serves me correctly, I joined EveryWare on November 25th 1995. Yesterday
> > marked 7 years since I first used Tango and became a member of the =3D
> > original
> > Tango-Talk list and I've enjoyed every minute.
> >
> > Thank you to all of you who have made the last 7 years so enjoyable and
I
> > look forward to spending many more years here.
> >
> > Steve Smith
> >
> > Oakbridge Information Solutions
> > Office: (519) 624-4388
> > GTA:    (416) 606-3885
> > Fax:    (519) 624-3353
> > Cell:   (416) 606-3885
> > Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Web:    http://www.oakbridge.ca
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:59:13 -0500
> > From: "Steve Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk:  Ping Rate-Off Topic
> >
> >
> > I'm not sure what your ultimate goal is but wouldn't it be useful to
store
> > this information over time and compare current results to an average?
> >
> > Just a thought,
> >
> > Steve Smith
> >
> > Oakbridge Information Solutions
> > Office: (519) 624-4388
> > GTA:    (416) 606-3885
> > Fax:    (519) 624-3353
> > Cell:   (416) 606-3885
> > Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Web:    http://www.oakbridge.ca
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Shubert
> > > Sent: November 26, 2002 1:51 PM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Ping Rate-Off Topic
> > >
> > >
> > > It's something like this, in the internet:
> > >
> > > 1-10 ms (milliseconds): Excellent (typically local 10/100 network)
> > > 11-50 ms: Typical for T1s, T3s, etc.
> > > 51-100 ms: Typical for Frame Relay, DSL, ISDN etc.
> > > 101-300 ms: Typical for 56K dial-up Modems
> > > 301+ ms: getting bad, probably some congestion
> > > 1000+ ms (1 second): horrible, mis-route or some other failure
> > >
> > > You should always do about 10 pings and get the average, since a
packet
> > > drop, a route build, or a collision can cause the occasional packet to
> > > be hundreds of ms more than it should be.
> > >
> > > Robert Shubert
> > > Tronics
> > >
> > > "Campbell, Steve V." wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Since this seems to be the topic at hand:
> > > >
> > > > I created an application that goes out and runs a set of externals
=3D
> > that
> > > > returns ping rates on IP's and Port Numbers.
> > > >
> > > > The hard part of this application I received help with from this
list,
> > > > but, the last part of this application I have ran into a wall.
> > > >
> > > > I need to know where I can be "steered" out on the web to find out
=3D
> > ping
> > > > rates and what is considered good, okay and bad.  I am trying to =3D
> > assign
> > > > different images to different ping rates, but, to be honest, I have
no
> > > > idea what is considered good or bad AND, I don't even know where to
> > > > start on the web trying to find that information.
> > > >
> > > > Any knowledge in this area or help would be greatly appreciated!
=3D
> > Thank
> > > > you!
> > > >
> > > > Steve
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Ben Johansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:37 AM
> > > > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > > >
> > > > Who server is it now :-)
> > > >
> > > > Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com
> > > > Authorized Witango Reseller
http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm
> > > > Latest downloads & List Archives @ http://www.witango.ws
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Web Dude
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:26 AM
> > > > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > > >
> > > > Poing!
> > > >
> > > > >Pong!
> > > > >
> > > > >I was wondering if there was a problem too...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > >From: Fogelson, Steve
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > >Sent: 25 November 2002 22:46
> > > > >To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > > >Subject: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >My web services were down this weekend. Just wanted to make sure I
> > > > didn't
> > > > >get bounced from the list.
> > > > >
> > > > >Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >Steve Fogelson
> > > > >Internet Commerce Solutions
> > > >
> > >______________________________________________________________________=
> > =3D
> > _
> > > > _
> > > > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > > >
> > >______________________________________________________________________=
> > =3D
> > _
> > > > _
> > > > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________=
> > =3D
> > _
> > > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]=
> > =3D
> > m
> > > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > > >
> > > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________=
> > =3D
> > _
> > > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]=
> > =3D
> > m
> > > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________=
> > =3D
> > _
> > > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]=
> > =3D
> > m
> > > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >
________________________________________________________________________
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:04:28 -0500
> > From: Web Dude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE:  RE: Witango-Talk:  Ping Rate-Off Topic
> >
> >
> > Since I have several T1's, with 30+ sites, ping rates have always=3D20
> > been paramount in testing the connection. Unfortunately, ping rates=3D20
> > will fluctuate widely according to connections, time of day, other=3D20
> > traffic, etc. Normally, I can get pings of 10 ms or less to sites=3D20
> > like google.com, alexa.com, netsol.com sending 56 byte packages..=3D20
> > Sometimes the rates will go down to 4 to 5 ms. Of cource this is T1=3D20
> > rates and my bandwidth for each pipe is rated at 1.5 mgs per sec,=3D20
> > point to point. As soon as you get into ISDN and DSL, the rates=3D20
> > change. Also, local trafiic on your network and any subnets you are=3D20
> > on with your provider also can be a factor.
> >
> > On really bad or heavy days, I have seen these rates go up to 50
ms.=3D20
> > Of course when pinging, let's say, Brazil, rates can be 500 ms to
in=3D20
> > the thousands with many packet losses.
> >
> > Hope this helps...
> >
> > >Since this seems to be the topic at hand:
> > >
> > >
> > >I created an application that goes out and runs a set of externals that
> > >returns ping rates on IP's and Port Numbers.=3D20
> > >
> > >The hard part of this application I received help with from this list,
> > >but, the last part of this application I have ran into a wall.
> > >
> > >I need to know where I can be "steered" out on the web to find out ping
> > >rates and what is considered good, okay and bad.  I am trying to assign
> > >different images to different ping rates, but, to be honest, I have no
> > >idea what is considered good or bad AND, I don't even know where to
> > >start on the web trying to find that information.
> > >
> > >Any knowledge in this area or help would be greatly appreciated!  Thank
> > >you!
> > >
> > >Steve
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Ben Johansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:37 AM
> > >To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > >Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > >
> > >Who server is it now :-)
> > >
> > >Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com
> > >Authorized Witango Reseller http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm
> > >Latest downloads & List Archives @ http://www.witango.ws
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Web Dude
> > >Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:26 AM
> > >To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > >Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > >
> > >Poing!
> > >
> > >>Pong!
> > >>
> > >>I was wondering if there was a problem too...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: Fogelson, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >>Sent: 25 November 2002 22:46
> > >>To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > >>Subject: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>My web services were down this weekend. Just wanted to make sure I
> > >didn't
> > >>get bounced from the list.
> > >>
> > >>Thanks
> > >>
> > >>Steve Fogelson
> > >>Internet Commerce Solutions
> >
>>_______________________________________________________________________
> > >_
> > >>TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>                  with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
>>_______________________________________________________________________
> > >_
> > >>TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>                  with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> >
>________________________________________________________________________
> > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >
> >
>________________________________________________________________________
> > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
>________________________________________________________________________
> > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> >
> > --=3D20
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:52:50 -0600
> > From: "Campbell, Steve V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk:  Please Clarify
> >
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > Is this the new rule now?
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=3D3D20
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:40 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > Subject: Witango-Talk: Please Clarify
> >
> > Now that one platform has left the version 5 Beta world, we've now got
> > readers who are using at least 3 different versions of Witango/Tango
> > (3.x,
> > 2000/4.x, and 5.x). Therefore it would help everyone if when you post to
> > the
> > list, you could provide some general information when asking a question.
> > I
> > was reading the reply that Atrix sent, which is correct if the product
> > is
> > Witango 4.x/2000 and earlier but is incorrect if you are using Witango
> > 5.0
> > or greater.
> >
> > Please include version, platform, database, method of connection (ODBC,
> > iODBC, OCI, etc.) and any other details that would be relevant to your
> > question.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Steve Smith
> >
> > Oakbridge Information Solutions
> > Office: (519) 624-4388
> > GTA:    (416) 606-3885
> > Fax:    (519) 624-3353
> > Cell:   (416) 606-3885
> > Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Web:    http://www.oakbridge.ca
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:10:58 -0600
> > From: "Campbell, Steve V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE:  Re: Witango-Talk:  Ping Rate-Off Topic
> >
> >
> > THANK YOU!
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Shubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=3D3D20
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:51 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Ping Rate-Off Topic
> >
> > It's something like this, in the internet:
> >
> > 1-10 ms (milliseconds): Excellent (typically local 10/100 network)
> > 11-50 ms: Typical for T1s, T3s, etc.
> > 51-100 ms: Typical for Frame Relay, DSL, ISDN etc.
> > 101-300 ms: Typical for 56K dial-up Modems
> > 301+ ms: getting bad, probably some congestion
> > 1000+ ms (1 second): horrible, mis-route or some other failure
> >
> > You should always do about 10 pings and get the average, since a packet
> > drop, a route build, or a collision can cause the occasional packet to
> > be hundreds of ms more than it should be.
> >
> > Robert Shubert
> > Tronics
> >
> > "Campbell, Steve V." wrote:
> > >=3D3D20
> > > Since this seems to be the topic at hand:
> > >=3D3D20
> > > I created an application that goes out and runs a set of externals
> > that
> > > returns ping rates on IP's and Port Numbers.
> > >=3D3D20
> > > The hard part of this application I received help with from this list,
> > > but, the last part of this application I have ran into a wall.
> > >=3D3D20
> > > I need to know where I can be "steered" out on the web to find out
> > ping
> > > rates and what is considered good, okay and bad.  I am trying to
> > assign
> > > different images to different ping rates, but, to be honest, I have no
> > > idea what is considered good or bad AND, I don't even know where to
> > > start on the web trying to find that information.
> > >=3D3D20
> > > Any knowledge in this area or help would be greatly appreciated!
> > Thank
> > > you!
> > >=3D3D20
> > > Steve
> > >=3D3D20
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ben Johansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:37 AM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > >=3D3D20
> > > Who server is it now :-)
> > >=3D3D20
> > > Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com
> > > Authorized Witango Reseller http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm
> > > Latest downloads & List Archives @ http://www.witango.ws
> > >=3D3D20
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Web Dude
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:26 AM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > >=3D3D20
> > > Poing!
> > >=3D3D20
> > > >Pong!
> > > >
> > > >I was wondering if there was a problem too...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Fogelson, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > >Sent: 25 November 2002 22:46
> > > >To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > >Subject: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >My web services were down this weekend. Just wanted to make sure I
> > > didn't
> > > >get bounced from the list.
> > > >
> > > >Thanks
> > > >
> > > >Steve Fogelson
> > > >Internet Commerce Solutions
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > > _
> > > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > > _
> > > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >=3D3D20
> > > --
> > >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >=3D3D20
> > >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:25:51 -0500
> > From: "THOMAS PETERS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: OT - Happy Anniversary to Me
> >
> >
> > <html><div style=3D3D'background-color:'><DIV>
> > <P>you da man...<BR><BR></P></DIV>
> > <DIV></DIV><BR><BR><BR>Thomas Peters=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>
> > <DIV></DIV>Imagery Graphics=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>Home: 603-598-7544=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>Mobile: 603-566-5406=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>
> > <DIV></DIV>
> > <DIV></DIV>
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;From: "Steve Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > <WITANGO-TALK@W=
> > =3D
> > ITANGO.COM>
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;Subject: Witango-Talk: OT - Happy Anniversary to Me=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:51:22 -0500=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;I'm not sure why I remember this kind of useless trivia,
=
> > =3D
> > but if my memory=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;serves me correctly, I joined EveryWare on November 25th
=
> > =3D
> > 1995. Yesterday=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;marked 7 years since I first used Tango and became
> > a member =
> > =3D
> > of the original=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;Tango-Talk list and I've enjoyed every minute.=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;Thank you to all of you who have made the last 7 years so
=
> > =3D
> > enjoyable and I=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;look forward to spending many more years here.=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;Steve Smith=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;Oakbridge Information Solutions=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;Office: (519) 624-4388=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;GTA: (416) 606-3885=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;Fax: (519) 624-3353=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;Cell: (416) 606-3885=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;Web: http://www.oakbridge.ca=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;___________________________________________________
> > _________=
> > =3D
> > ____________=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt;TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to =3D
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV>&gt; with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body=3D20
> > <DIV></DIV></div><br clear=3D3Dall><hr>Add photos to your e-mail with <a
=
> > =3D
> > href=3D3D"http://g.msn.com/8HMFEN/2022";>MSN 8.</a> Get 2 months
> > FREE*.</htm=
> > l>=3D
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:29:50 -0700
> > From: Troy Sosamon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk:  Ping Rate-Off Topic
> >
> >
> > Something else to think about is what you are pinging.
> > Are you pinging all the way across the internet to someone else's
> > server, =
> > =3D
> > or=3D20
> > are you pinging your gateway router.
> > You might want to think about using tracert or neo trace where you can
=3D
> > see=3D20
> > the timing of each hop along the way.  Once you get past your
> > firewall,=3D2=
> > 0
> > router, and your ISPs gateway, you don't have any control over
> > the timing. =
> > =3D
> > =3D20
> > I have an automated IP monitor that continually pings the gateway for my
=
> > =3D
> > DSL=3D20
> > router, so I know that my connection is always up, and when it
> > goes down, =
> > =3D
> > I=3D20
> > know it before qwest (my isp) does.
> >
> > Troy Sosamon
> >
> > =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D Original Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
> > at 11/26/02 =3D
> > 11:50 am
> > >It's something like this, in the internet:
> > >
> > >1-10 ms (milliseconds): Excellent (typically local 10/100 network)
> > >11-50 ms: Typical for T1s, T3s, etc.
> > >51-100 ms: Typical for Frame Relay, DSL, ISDN etc.
> > >101-300 ms: Typical for 56K dial-up Modems
> > >301+ ms: getting bad, probably some congestion
> > >1000+ ms (1 second): horrible, mis-route or some other failure
> > >
> > >You should always do about 10 pings and get the average, since a packet
> > >drop, a route build, or a collision can cause the occasional packet to
> > >be hundreds of ms more than it should be.
> > >
> > >Robert Shubert
> > >Tronics
> > >
> > >"Campbell, Steve V." wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Since this seems to be the topic at hand:
> > >>
> > >> I created an application that goes out and runs a set of externals
that
> > >> returns ping rates on IP's and Port Numbers.
> > >>
> > >> The hard part of this application I received help with from this
list,
> > >> but, the last part of this application I have ran into a wall.
> > >>
> > >> I need to know where I can be "steered" out on the web to find out
ping
> > >> rates and what is considered good, okay and bad.  I am trying to
assign
> > >> different images to different ping rates, but, to be honest, I have
no
> > >> idea what is considered good or bad AND, I don't even know where to
> > >> start on the web trying to find that information.
> > >>
> > >> Any knowledge in this area or help would be greatly appreciated!
Thank
> > >> you!
> > >>
> > >> Steve
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Ben Johansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:37 AM
> > >> To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > >> Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > >>
> > >> Who server is it now :-)
> > >>
> > >> Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com
> > >> Authorized Witango Reseller http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm
> > >> Latest downloads & List Archives @ http://www.witango.ws
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Web Dude
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:26 AM
> > >> To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > >> Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > >>
> > >> Poing!
> > >>
> > >> >Pong!
> > >> >
> > >> >I was wondering if there was a problem too...
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >-----Original Message-----
> > >> >From: Fogelson, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >> >Sent: 25 November 2002 22:46
> > >> >To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > >> >Subject: Witango-Talk: Ping
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >My web services were down this weekend. Just wanted to make sure I
> > >> didn't
> > >> >get bounced from the list.
> > >> >
> > >> >Thanks
> > >> >
> > >> >Steve Fogelson
> > >> >Internet Commerce Solutions
> > >>
> >
>_______________________________________________________________________=
> > =3D
> >
> > >> _
> > >> >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >>
> >
>_______________________________________________________________________=
> > =3D
> >
> > >> _
> > >> >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> >
________________________________________________________________________=
> > =3D
> >
> > >> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]=
> > =3D
> >
> > >>                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >>
> > >>
> >
________________________________________________________________________=
> > =3D
> >
> > >> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]=
> > =3D
> >
> > >>                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >>
> >
________________________________________________________________________=
> > =3D
> >
> > >> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]=
> > =3D
> >
> > >>                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
>________________________________________________________________________
> > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:35:51 -0500
> > From: "Steve Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk:  Please Clarify
> >
> >
> > As far as I know, there are no rules for the list, it's always been
> > something that we should be doing. I've seen answers that have been =3D
> > provided
> > that were well intended, and were in some ways correct, but were not
> > accurate for the specific question because the original post failed to
> > include that it was a specific platform, etc. It was a gentle reminder
=3D
> > that
> > I used to post (when I was list Mom) whenever a new version went into
> > production which as we all know, hasn't happened in a very, very, long
=3D
> > time.
> > The response that Atrix sent made me remember.
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> >
> > Steve Smith
> >
> > Oakbridge Information Solutions
> > Office: (519) 624-4388
> > GTA:    (416) 606-3885
> > Fax:    (519) 624-3353
> > Cell:   (416) 606-3885
> > Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Web:    http://www.oakbridge.ca
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Campbell, Steve V.
> > > Sent: November 26, 2002 1:53 PM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Please Clarify
> > >
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > > Is this the new rule now?
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:40 PM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > Subject: Witango-Talk: Please Clarify
> > >
> > > Now that one platform has left the version 5 Beta world, we've now got
> > > readers who are using at least 3 different versions of Witango/Tango
> > > (3.x,
> > > 2000/4.x, and 5.x). Therefore it would help everyone if when you post
to
> > > the
> > > list, you could provide some general information when asking a
question.
> > > I
> > > was reading the reply that Atrix sent, which is correct if the product
> > > is
> > > Witango 4.x/2000 and earlier but is incorrect if you are using Witango
> > > 5.0
> > > or greater.
> > >
> > > Please include version, platform, database, method of connection
(ODBC,
> > > iODBC, OCI, etc.) and any other details that would be relevant to your
> > > question.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Steve Smith
> > >
> > > Oakbridge Information Solutions
> > > Office: (519) 624-4388
> > > GTA:    (416) 606-3885
> > > Fax:    (519) 624-3353
> > > Cell:   (416) 606-3885
> > > Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Web:    http://www.oakbridge.ca
> > >
> > >
> > >
________________________________________________________________________
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >
________________________________________________________________________
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:04:16 -0600
> > From: "Wilcox, Jamileh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: <@INCLUDE> problem
> >
> >
> > Is there a problem with using <@INCLUDE> with a TAF file?
> >
> > Or a problem with nesting <@INCLUDE> in an inline frame?
> >
> > If so, is there another method to use?
> >
> > I've got an entry page that uses an IFrame with a taf src file.  That
> > src file has an <@INCLUDE> for another taf file. =3D3D20
> >
> > The browser shows the structure of the final taf file (i.e., the If/Else
> > statements, the Search statements, etc) rather than the correct output.
> > There's also a couple of extra brackets thrown in for good measure (like
> > so):  ]]>
> >
> > I've searched all 3 tafs for open brackets, open tags, etc., without any
> > luck, both looking through the tafs & using the View Source.  I've
> > stripped all 3 tafs down to essentials (just HTML, HEAD, BODY, etc.) and
> > still have the same problem (which seems to eliminate the open tags
> > possibility).  I've created new copies of all 3 tafs.  Nothing seems to
> > fix this, so I'm starting to wonder if I'm doing something that Witango
> > just won't do.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > jamileh
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 15:51:02 -0800
> > From: "Ben Johansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk:  <@INCLUDE> problem
> >
> >
> > This is because the sub TAF (TAF Call in an @INCLUDE) reference is not
> > processed as a TAF by the server. It is just passed through as XML
> > inside.
> > The original @INCLUDE
> >
> > Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com
> > Authorized Witango Reseller
http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm=3D20
> > Latest downloads & List Archives @ http://www.witango.ws
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wilcox, Jamileh
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 3:04 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > Subject: Witango-Talk: <@INCLUDE> problem
> >
> > Is there a problem with using <@INCLUDE> with a TAF file?
> >
> > Or a problem with nesting <@INCLUDE> in an inline frame?
> >
> > If so, is there another method to use?
> >
> > I've got an entry page that uses an IFrame with a taf src file.  That
> > src file has an <@INCLUDE> for another taf file. =3D20
> >
> > The browser shows the structure of the final taf file (i.e., the If/Else
> > statements, the Search statements, etc) rather than the correct output.
> > There's also a couple of extra brackets thrown in for good measure (like
> > so):  ]]>
> >
> > I've searched all 3 tafs for open brackets, open tags, etc., without any
> > luck, both looking through the tafs & using the View Source.  I've
> > stripped all 3 tafs down to essentials (just HTML, HEAD, BODY, etc.) and
> > still have the same problem (which seems to eliminate the open tags
> > possibility).  I've created new copies of all 3 tafs.  Nothing seems to
> > fix this, so I'm starting to wonder if I'm doing something that Witango
> > just won't do.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > jamileh
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 18:09:29 -0600
> > From: "Wilcox, Jamileh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk:  <@INCLUDE> problem
> >
> >
> > Well, I tried using branch in the SRC file (instead of the INCLUDE), but
> > nothing shows up at all with that.
> >
> > It sounds like you're saying I should set up the branch in the first
> > taf, but I don't know how to set up a branch within an <IFRAME>.  Can
> > that be done?
> >
> > Thanks!     j
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: run run [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=3D3D20
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 5:48 PM
> > > To: Wilcox, Jamileh
> > > Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: <@INCLUDE> problem
> > >=3D3D20
> > >=3D3D20
> > >=3D3D20
> > > PLEASE REPLY TO THIS ADDRESS:
> > >=3D3D20
> > > First, you ought to try branch action for your parent=3D3D20
> > > frame and than use <@include> in your child frame.
> > >=3D3D20
> > > The "]]>" is an xml source of your tango code.
> > > It's not translated properly from tango.dtd partly
> > > because parant frame call(using <@include>) the
> > > <@include> source code of inner frame..
> > >=3D3D20
> > > Anyway, See Branch action for more detail, I think
> > > this will help you.=3D3D20
> > >=3D3D20
> > > Tabi..
> > >=3D3D20
> > >=3D3D20
> > >=3D3D20
> > > --- "Wilcox, Jamileh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Is there a problem with using <@INCLUDE> with a TAF
> > > > file?
> > > >=3D3D20
> > > > Or a problem with nesting <@INCLUDE> in an inline
> > > > frame?
> > > >=3D3D20
> > > > If so, is there another method to use?
> > > >=3D3D20
> > > > I've got an entry page that uses an IFrame with a
> > > > taf src file.  That
> > > > src file has an <@INCLUDE> for another taf file.
> > > >=3D3D20
> > > > The browser shows the structure of the final taf
> > > > file (i.e., the If/Else
> > > > statements, the Search statements, etc) rather than
> > > > the correct output.
> > > > There's also a couple of extra brackets thrown in
> > > > for good measure (like
> > > > so):  ]]>
> > > >=3D3D20
> > > > I've searched all 3 tafs for open brackets, open
> > > > tags, etc., without any
> > > > luck, both looking through the tafs & using the View
> > > > Source.  I've
> > > > stripped all 3 tafs down to essentials (just HTML,
> > > > HEAD, BODY, etc.) and
> > > > still have the same problem (which seems to
> > > > eliminate the open tags
> > > > possibility).  I've created new copies of all 3
> > > > tafs.  Nothing seems to
> > > > fix this, so I'm starting to wonder if I'm doing
> > > > something that Witango
> > > > just won't do.
> > > >=3D3D20
> > > > Any suggestions?
> > > >=3D3D20
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > jamileh
> > > >=3D3D20
> > > >
> > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > __________
> > > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to=3D3D20
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the
> > > > message body
> > >=3D3D20
> > >=3D3D20
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.=3D3D20
> > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 18:00:23 -0600
> > From: "Wilcox, Jamileh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE:  RE: Witango-Talk:  <@INCLUDE> problem
> >
> >
> > That would explain it.  OK, back to the drawing board.
> >
> > Thanks!     j
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ben Johansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=3D3D20
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 5:51 PM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: <@INCLUDE> problem
> > >=3D3D20
> > >=3D3D20
> > > This is because the sub TAF (TAF Call in an @INCLUDE)=3D3D20
> > > reference is not processed as a TAF by the server. It is just=3D3D20
> > > passed through as XML inside. The original @INCLUDE
> > >=3D3D20
> > > Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com
> > > Authorized Witango Reseller
> > http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm=3D3=
> > D2=3D
> > 0
> > > Latest downloads & List Archives @ http://www.witango.ws
> > >=3D3D20
> > >=3D3D20
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]=3D3D20
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of Wilcox,=3D3D20
> > > Jamileh
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 3:04 PM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> > > Subject: Witango-Talk: <@INCLUDE> problem
> > >=3D3D20
> > > Is there a problem with using <@INCLUDE> with a TAF file?
> > >=3D3D20
> > > Or a problem with nesting <@INCLUDE> in an inline frame?
> > >=3D3D20
> > > If so, is there another method to use?
> > >=3D3D20
> > > I've got an entry page that uses an IFrame with a taf src=3D3D20
> > > file.  That src file has an <@INCLUDE> for another taf file. =3D3D20
> > >=3D3D20
> > > The browser shows the structure of the final taf file (i.e.,=3D3D20
> > > the If/Else statements, the Search statements, etc) rather=3D3D20
> > > than the correct output. There's also a couple of extra=3D3D20
> > > brackets thrown in for good measure (like
> > > so):  ]]>
> > >=3D3D20
> > > I've searched all 3 tafs for open brackets, open tags, etc.,=3D3D20
> > > without any luck, both looking through the tafs & using the=3D3D20
> > > View Source.  I've stripped all 3 tafs down to essentials=3D3D20
> > > (just HTML, HEAD, BODY, etc.) and still have the same problem=3D3D20
> > > (which seems to eliminate the open tags possibility).  I've=3D3D20
> > > created new copies of all 3 tafs.  Nothing seems to fix this,=3D3D20
> > > so I'm starting to wonder if I'm doing something that Witango=3D3D20
> > > just won't do.
> > >=3D3D20
> > > Any suggestions?
> > >=3D3D20
> > > Thanks!
> > > jamileh
> > >=3D3D20
> > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > __________
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to=3D3D20
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >=3D3D20
> > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > __________
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to=3D3D20
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
> > >=3D3D20
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> > End of witango-talk Digest V01 #880
> > ***********************************
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> > End of witango-talk Digest V01 #881
> > ***********************************
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> > End of witango-talk Digest V01 #882
> > ***********************************
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body

________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body

Reply via email to