Witango is taking the results and placing them in a variable (file on server) and then starting at 1 counting to 100 and sending that to the browser. This works very quickly, but as you get farther away from record 1 it takes longer to sequentially count down the file.
Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com Authorized Witango Reseller http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm Authorized MDaemon Mail Server Reseller http://www.pcforge.com/AltN.htm -----Original Message----- From: Ted Wolfley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 12:02 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Witango-Talk: Search reterivial follow up I just ran an experiment with about 50,000 records, retrieving 1000 at a time. I had the same results so it isn't the quantity of records, it's when page 10 + (10,000+ records) is retrieved. Anyone have any ideas? Ted -----Original Message----- From: Ted Wolfley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 2:10 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Witango-Talk: Search reterivial Hi, In a search action, I am retrieving 1949 records in alphabetical order, 100 records at a time. The first 1000 records (10 web pages) are returned quickly. It is after the 1000 record that performance goes down hill with each sequential page taking longer. Does any one know why this would be happening and how to improve performance? Ted ________________________________________________________________________ TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf ________________________________________________________________________ TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf ________________________________________________________________________ TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf
