Our VARIABLETIMEOUT= is set to zero and we are not resetting it in code. I can't remember if we changed it or/and if we did, why we changed it. Does the variable timeout from the last time it is accessed? What is the preferred number for it?
Thanks Ted -----Original Message----- From: Scott Cadillac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 2:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: witango log Hi Ted, What is your VARIABLETIMEOUT= set to? An [Expired] entry in your log file should show some activity for that key "x" mintures earlier (where "x" is equal to VARIABLETIMEOUT=). Or are you doing <@ASSIGN User$variableTimout VALUE="x"> somewhere in your code? This can override the VARIABLETIMEOUT= in the server.ini file. Hope this helps. Cheers... -----Original Message----- From: Ted Wolfley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:59:59 -0500 Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: witango log > I did a random search on a few userreferences that are in the expired > section and that is the only place that they appear. And we have had > instances of user variables being lost but they are so random it is > hard to track down the cause. > > Ted > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Cadillac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 1:39 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: witango log > > > Hi Ted, > > I was just having a very similar discussion off-list with someone > else. > > Where you crawled by a search engine(s) this morning? > > These kinds of entries are normal, but an "excessive" amount can point > to one or two things: > > ----------- > ~~ Search Engines normally do not (or care about) the ability to store > cookies and the UserReference key used for managing User Scope > variables > is a "session-cookie". Witango typically issues these keys > automatically. > > So "each page" crawl from an Engine is just like a new visitor to your > site. Each crawl is typically issued a new UserReference key. > > This is normal behavior, and there is nothing wrong with this (other > platforms like PHP and ASP also use session-cookies this way) - but > it's > also a good reason to not assign too many User Scope variables > unnecessarily. > > As a rule, I only assign a User Scope variable if I have a "very" good > reason to. > > Note: the same above behavior can also come from robot scripts > attacking a website. > > ----------- > ~~ The other reason could be that something in your code is preventing > the Witango server from issuing the keys properly in a managed fashion, > and the fall back behavior of the Server is to keep issuing new ones > (if > the previous ones are going missing). > > This can happen if you have any custom local$httpHeader variable > assignments that don't also include <@userreferencecookie>, or use it > properly. > > --- > The [Expired], in your logs, comes from when these previously used > session-cookies go unused for whatever your default expiry time is > (default is 30 minutes). > > Open your log file in a text editor, select one of the expired key > values lower down in the file - then search "up" to see how many times > that key > was used. This can help point to your problem (if any). > > --- > Do your Users sometime loose their sessions (User variables)? > > Let us know, otherwise I hope this helps. Cheers... > > Scott Cadillac, > 403-281-6090 ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------ > XML-Extranet ~ http://xmlx.ca ~ http://forums.xmlx.ca Well-formed > Programming in C# .NET, Witango, MSIE and XML > ------------ > Witango ~ http://witango.org > EasyXSLT ~ http://easyxslt.ca > IIS Watcher ~ http://iiswatcher.ca > ------------ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Wolfley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:17:05 -0500 > Subject: Witango-Talk: witango log > > > Hi, > > > > I just restarted the our witango 5.0 service on a windows 2000 > > server because the webpages were slow in coming up. When I looked > > into the witango server log, there were 4801 entries of "[Expired] > > Variables for key". each entry had a different key. The service was > > restarted 12:00am this morning. > > Are these entries normal and can a build up of userreferences slow > down > > the > > server? > > > > > > Ted Wolfley > > Database/Internet Programmer > > The Ogden Group of Rochester > > phone: (585) 321 1060 x23 > > fax: (585) 321 0043 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > www.ogdengroup.com <http://www.ogdengroup.com/> > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > _ > > _ > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf > > ______________________________________________________________________ > _ > _ > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf > _______________________________________________________________________ > _ > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf ________________________________________________________________________ TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf ________________________________________________________________________ TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
