Nope, it always works good
for me, since T2K. Once a server becomes unavailable, the plugin realizes it
and sends requests to the other servers.
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Garcia
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005
9:03 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: load
balancing - Witango 5.5 on windows server 2003.
Is that a new feature of 5.5? I have found if a
witango server on a load group goes down, the webserver will til try to send it
requests.
--
Robert Garcia
President - BigHead Technology
VP Application Development - eventpix.com
13653 West Park Dr
Paradise, Ca 95954
ph: 530.645.4040 x222 fax: 530.645.4040
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bighead.net/ - http://eventpix.com/
On Feb 4, 2005, at 5:59 AM, Robert Shubert wrote:
1.
The tafs only exist in one place, yes, with the website – which is on A
2.
provided you mean A’s Witango service, and not the whole server (thus keeping
the website/client running), then yes, B would fulfill all requests.
3.
they go boom. Users are pushed to B on the next hit and their old USR from A
will not be found. Witango does not balance USR information.
-----Original Message-----
From:
Chuck Lockwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Friday, February 04, 2005 8:12 AM
To:
[email protected]
Subject:
Witango-Talk: load balancing - Witango 5.5 on windows server 2003.
Three simple questions, I hope.
If the Witango client on machine A
is pointing to Witango servers on A and B
1. The tafs only exist on A?
2. If server A goes down or is
under heavy load, does server B pick up all new sessions?
3. If server A goes down or is under
heavy load, does anything happen to existing sessions?
________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to
http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to
http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
