Thank you Phil,

We appreciate the info.

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Wade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 7:23 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: FW: Witango-Talk: Solaris Tango 3.6 question
> 
> The JVM should not be an issue as I do not think that it was 
> part of the
> feature set of T3.6.  (My memory does not go back that far so I may be
> wrong)
> 
> It should be possible to run the server as long as you have 
> the correct
> libraries installed.  The executable will complain on load if 
> it cannot find
> libraries it needs.  You can create a sym link with the old 
> name to the new
> libraries and see if the server will link it in when it 
> loads.  As long as
> the symbols and APIs have not changed you should be OK.
> 
> OS Version - Try and stay with an OS version that is no more 
> than 2-3 years
> later than the Tango build.
> 
> Stability - I would keep a close eye on it and would not 
> recommend doing
> this for mission critical apps.
> 
> They can contact me off list if they want to get into more detail.
> 
> Phil
> 
> 
> > From: "Scott Cadillac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 3 March 2005 11:13:38 AM
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Solaris Tango 3.6 question
> > Reply-To: [email protected]
> >
> > Thank you Bill,
> >
> > The Java Virtual Machine being too old makes sense to me (a 
> Microsoft
> > guy
> > :-).
> >
> > What about Tango 3.6 being able to run on Solaris 7.x? Any thoughts
> > anyone?
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Bill Conlon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 5:03 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Solaris Tango 3.6 question
> >>
> >> First guess:  JVM is too old.
> >> On Wednesday, March 2, 2005, at 03:55  PM, Scott Cadillac wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm just relaying this question for somebody who's Email
> >> system won't
> >>> permit
> >>> sends to the List directly.
> >>>
> >>> --------------------------
> >>> Hope somebody can help by answering this question: Why attempt to
> >>> install
> >>> Patchlink on TANGO 3.6 Application Server (Solaris 2.6) fails?
> >>>     
> >>> Would TANGO 3.6 Enterprise Server run on OS greater than
> >> Solaris 7?
> >>> Right
> >>> now, we're running our system on a Solaris 2.6 machine.
> >>>     
> >>> We are planning to upgrade to Witango soon; meantime our
> >> ITSecurity has
> >>> mandated the installation of PATCHLINK on all servers. But
> >> our legacy
> >>> system
> >>> needs to be maintained till we get the Witango upgrade.
> >>> --------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Hope someone can respond.
> >>>
> >>> Scott Cadillac
> >>> ---------
> >>> Business Extranet Freedom
> >>> IExtranet ~ http://IExtranet.com
> >>> Online Demo ~ http://www.northwind.org/#demo
> >>> ---------
> >>> Weblog ~ http://xmlx.ca
> >>> For Hire ~ http://xmlx.ca/forhire
> >>> ---------
> >>> 403-254-5002 ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> ---------
> >>> P.O. Box 69006
> >>> RPO Bridlewood SW
> >>> Calgary, Alberta
> >>> Canada T2Y 4T9
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> ______________________________________________________________
> >> _________
> >>> _
> >>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to 
> http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
> >>>
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________________________
> >> __________
> >> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
> >>
> >
> >
> > 
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> > _
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
> >
> 
> 
> ------ End of Forwarded Message
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
> 


________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf

Reply via email to