A well written application running on a well constructed WT server is very efficient. I can tell you that at this moment, I have one service with 1/4 million requests processed and an average request processing time of 4/10 of second. And in 3 days, it hasn't had more than 7 simultaneously active threads.
Robert -----Original Message----- From: Dan Weiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 1:56 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Witango-Talk: Server Question Hi All - We're new to the list...and also to WiTango. We'll be offering hosting service very soon, and we're configuring the server now. One question: Can anyone give me an idea of what kind of performance hit I can expect server-wise with the software.? For comparison, Fx.php is VERY efficient - no "running" process, it just launches the php.cgi for a brief milisecond when requests occur...vs. Lasso which has multiple processes running all the time and is a TOTAL hog. Thanks for your input. Dan Weiss Buddy Systems Inc. Makers of ISP Easy(TM) and WebHosting Easy(TM) "The software that saves you the time you need to think about tomorrow" 19 Chelsea Court Chagrin Falls, Ohio 44022 www.buddysystems.com Phone (440) 338-6874 Sales (800) 783-3346 AIM: buddysy ICQ: 13694975 ________________________________________________________________________ TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf ________________________________________________________________________ TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
