Have you tested <@URL with the xml spec yet? I have found it is not flexible enough for special types of posts, like this one maybe. You may have to set headers, etc.

I am sure I can find some java code that I can use as a framework. Let me know if your test works.

I will posting the verisign bean, and the magick bean, in the next day or two.

It went into production today, once you resolve what doesn't work, and don't use in the studio, the beans just work, and don't fail.

I even tested the beans against the witango dll sample, and made a simple dll. The bean was just as fast, if it was already instantiated in memory as an object.

-- 

Robert Garcia
President - BigHead Technology
VP Application Development - eventpix.com
13653 West Park Dr
Magalia, Ca 95954
ph: 530.645.4040 x222 fax: 530.645.4040

On May 9, 2006, at 12:45 PM, Robert Shubert wrote:

I have not yet started construction on my new method, but I am anticipating

to use the XML structure along with Witango's built-in @URL to do the

communication. If that should fail me, I'll probably fall back to that built

in object (winhttp 5.1 I think?).


________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf

Reply via email to