So looking into this deeper, I noticed on the Witango site that there is the
following:


Witango for J2EE v5.5           Standard Edition        AU$ 6499 US$ 4875
EURO 4030

Witango for J2EE v5.5           Application Edition    AU$ 3998 US$ 2999
EURO 2479

 

I wonder if I made a stupid assumption. I was under the impression that if I
compiled from the Witango studio into J2EE compiled code that tomcat could
just run it. Does it actually need the Witango pluggin and is that what
costs 3-5k? Is there anything else I am missing? 

 

What I was hoping to do is use this in conjunction with flex. The advantage
of flex for a front end is that it is completely browser and platform
independent. Using java to provide back end database services truly appealed
to me - especially if we could capitalize on the rapid development time that
Witango provides us. Most systems are java enabled and that would allow us a
certain freedom from the Witango server for our self hosted clients. 

 

Shane Pearlman

831.345.7033

S <http://www.shaneandpeter.com> &P, Inc.

 

 

  _____  

From: Dale Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 11:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Compiling for J2EE

 

Yes, we use TCFs a lot and also custom tags. Works perfectly. (Once the code
is "Java clean", of course!)

 

On May 15, 2007, at 1:04 PM, Shane Pearlman wrote:





Nice. This is great.

 

Are you using TCF objects at all? How are they working out?

 

-S

 

Shane Pearlman

831.345.7033

 <http://www.shaneandpeter.com> S&P, Inc.

 

 

  _____  

From: Dale Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 6:28 PM
To:  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Compiling for J2EE

 

We've used JBoss (SLOW compared to Tomcat - too much overhead that we just
did not need), are now using Tomcat (works just fine), and are experimenting
with Resin (FAST!)

 

JDBC to Oracle. 

 

On May 14, 2007, at 9:09 PM, Shane Pearlman wrote:






Thanks Dale,

 

Which J2EE server are you using? JBoss, Geronimo, TomCat (doesn't appear to
be a full j2ee server - can it be used) . ?

 

Are you using ODBC or JDBC for database connectivity?

 

-S

 

Shane Pearlman

831.345.7033

 <http://www.shaneandpeter.com> S&P, Inc.

 

 

  _____  

From: Dale Graham [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 5:41 PM
To:  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Compiling for J2EE

 

We're running an enterprise-wide application for data collection and a
public access website about this data for a US Federal organization.

 

Main glitches: quirks of various J2EE server; variables are *not* retained
if you have to restart the server (unlike the WitangoServer, which does save
user sessions); J2EE needs to be restarted for changes to take effect.

 

If your code will run on the 5.5 WitangoServer, then it's close to being
ready to compile. We develop, test on WitangoServer before ever moving to
compilation. The syntax checker helps, but you will have occasional
instances where the compiler fails anyway (due to bad coding). You have to
really go crazy on quoting if you want reliable apps. E.g., <@ifequal this
that> is not good. To make array filters work, you pretty much have to do
this <@assign name="request$this" value="<@filter array='request$thatarray'
expr='#2 = "whatever" '>"> or it's very likely to fail. You cannot go wrong,
quoting everything (properly nested, of course).

 

If you use lots of include files you can change these on the fly without
having to restart the J2EE server. (Advantage!)

If you use lots of include files you increase your chances of putting in
code that will cause errors on the J2EE server, and these of course are not
checked by either the syntax checker or compiler (Disadvantage!)

 

It's a learning process, getting from older code to J2EE-successful code,
but we have found that (with debugged code) it is a remarkably robust,
well-performing solution. Initially it was a bit painful, but now we do it
so routinely, it's hard to recall lots of our "learning curve" issues.

 

Haven't experimented with v6 yet.

 

On May 14, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Shane Pearlman wrote:







Hi folks,

We have been poking at the compile to J2EE option under projects in the 5.5
studio.

Has anyone deployed a solution using this? What was your experience? Tips,
thoughts, bugs, quirks & issues we should know about?

Has this changed much with 6.0 beta?

Shane Pearlman

831.345.7033

 <http://www.shaneandpeter.com> S&P, Inc.

________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to  <http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf>
http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf







 

________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to  <http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf>
http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to  <http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf>
http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf






 

________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf





 



________________________________________________________________________

TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf

________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf

Reply via email to