On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Lalo Martins <[email protected]> wrote: > Please, keep Wt in real C++. Use of Qt is strictly banned in my company, > so if Wt were to switch, I'd have to find a new toolkit, or fork from the > last boost version.
Why is Qt banned? Now that Qt is LGPL, I don't see a reason for that. > Re Qt having more features: yeah, that's what I call bloat. Those > features really belong in separate libraries. Qt is already split in libraries: QtCore, QtGui, QtNetwork, QtSvg, QtXml, etc -- Pau Garcia i Quiles http://www.elpauer.org (Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
