Hey guys,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
<[email protected]>wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Lasse Kärkkäinen
> <[email protected] <tronic%[email protected]>> wrote:
> > I hope that Wt stays away from Qt because the library does not follow
> > good C++ practices. It enforces OOP everywhere, it requires a special
> > precompiler that breaks when you try to use templates. It doesn't use
> > namespaces, exceptions or templates, all of which are very central parts
> > of modern C++.
>
> Bullshit.
>
> Enforcing OOP everywhere is a good C++ practice. OOP is the central
> point of C++, in case you've forgotten.
>
>
The answer to the question: "What is good C++ practice" depends very much on
who you ask. The reason for this is probably that folks have differing
requirements.
Add personal preference, differing skill sets, the NIH syndrome and plain
old faith
into the mix and you have a recipe for pointless discussion.
Both Qt and boost are useful. They happen to be useful for different things
and in differing
circumstances with some degree of overlap.
Let folks use the tool most suitable for the job in their situation.
Witty is a cool toolkit; seemingly inspired by certain things in Qt while at
the same time
making use of Boost.
Let's continue to be pragmatic.
Kind regards,
Maurice
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
