Hi Dmitriy, > First of all, this list is not right place for any kind of "holy war".
how do you come to the conclusion that I want to start a "my thing is better than yours" war? It's absolutely not about that. maybe a better subject would be "JWt compared to Wicket", not vs. I think both frameworks share some design decisions, for example both are widget centric. Both maintain application state. Both support degradation. Both are actively developed and supported. Both go beyond the capabilities of django for example. So both frameworks seem to be comparable. For sure there are differences and I'm interested in knowing about them. Examples: Wt supports different languages, Wicket maintains an application state history to support the "back" button. > IMO more correctly to tell here about the task, which you want to solve > to understand, whether will JWt suitable for you or not. The task is at the moment to see where they both fit in the framework cosmos. It's as simple as that. regards, Frank ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
