Hey,
2011/9/12 Nagaev Boris <bnag...@gmail.com>
> Hello!
>
> > And just a hint, you'd brake any existing code by changing the extension.
> The proposal was as follows:
> > If not, I have a proposal : keep the "extensionless" include files (of
> course
> > !) but make them empty proxies for includes with an extension.
> > For example, Wt/WWidget would only contain this line : #include
> <Wt/WWidget.h>
> > (or any naming/location variant you may want)
>
> > Just look at Qt (#include <QWidget>)
> > or the STL headers (#include <string>).
> These libraries are standard (and almost standard) libraries.
> IMHO, "extensionless" seems to be a privilege of standard libraries.
> However, look at boost: #include <boost/foreach.hpp>
>
> BR.
>
I think, its better to ask Eclipse (or any IDE/editor which care about
extension) developers to improve theirs IDEs rather than add
a huge amount of alternate header files.
--
// Dmitriy.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
witty-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
