Out of interest will switching to Mercurial mean the that the source would match the releases? The CVS source has always been quite a way behind the releases so if switching to Mercurial would mean it could be kept inline that would really be a benefit.
Neil From: Rob Mensching [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 29 April 2010 21:43 To: Windows Installer XML toolset developer mailing list Subject: Re: [WiX-devs] [WiX-users] WiX 3.5 Source Code That sounds good but you might wait a few days. I'm close enough to a Mercurial solution that I might just flip to that and abandon CVS. I'll know for sure in the next week. On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Neil Sleightholm <[email protected]> wrote: Moved to wix-devs as suggested. Sounds good to me, I will start raising issues when I find then with builds from the CVS if that is ok. Neil -----Original Message----- From: Bob Arnson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 29 April 2010 13:56 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WiX-users] WiX 3.5 Source Code On 4/27/2010 1:56 AM, Neil Sleightholm wrote: > Also, which do you think should work - building from the zip or cvs or > both? CVS -- sig://boB http://joyofsetup.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ _______________________________________________ WiX-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ WiX-devs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-devs -- virtually, Rob Mensching - http://RobMensching.com LLC
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ WiX-devs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-devs
