That is one of my goals. The internal processes I have with CVS is pretty complex today. I really want to simplify it but I need to balance that desire against disrupting v3.5 and v3.6 work.
-- virtually, Rob Mensching - http://RobMensching.com LLC On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Neil Sleightholm <[email protected]> wrote: > Out of interest will switching to Mercurial mean the that the source > would match the releases? The CVS source has always been quite a way behind > the releases so if switching to Mercurial would mean it could be kept inline > that would really be a benefit. > > > > Neil > > > > *From:* Rob Mensching [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* 29 April 2010 21:43 > *To:* Windows Installer XML toolset developer mailing list > *Subject:* Re: [WiX-devs] [WiX-users] WiX 3.5 Source Code > > > > That sounds good but you might wait a few days. I'm close enough to a > Mercurial solution that I might just flip to that and abandon CVS. I'll know > for sure in the next week. > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Neil Sleightholm <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Moved to wix-devs as suggested. > > Sounds good to me, I will start raising issues when I find then with > builds from the CVS if that is ok. > > > Neil > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Arnson [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: 29 April 2010 13:56 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [WiX-users] WiX 3.5 Source Code > > On 4/27/2010 1:56 AM, Neil Sleightholm wrote: > > Also, which do you think should work - building from the zip or cvs or > > both? > CVS > > -- > sig://boB > http://joyofsetup.com/ > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ WiX-devs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-devs
