1.       If application returns no on WM_QUERYENDSESSION then you wouldn't send 
WM_ENDSESSION?

2.       How much time between WM_QUERYENDSESSION before calling  
WM_ENDSESSION?  Is this the 5s you where talking about below?

From: Rob Mensching [mailto:r...@robmensching.com]
Sent: February 20, 2013 5:29 PM
To: Windows Installer XML toolset developer mailing list
Subject: Re: [WiX-devs] RFC: CloseApps extension enhancements.

1. The new code will be new code. If you don't use the new attributes nothing 
will change. I'm planning to to this in wix38 (should have mentioned that) so 
it must be backwards compatible.

2. The SCM will do whatever it is directed to do when the process crashes based 
on the service configuration. Getting killed looks nearly identical to crashing 
(I think your process ends with a different return code).

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Neil Sleightholm 
<n...@x2systems.com<mailto:n...@x2systems.com>> wrote:
Sounds good but a couple of thoughts:

1.       I seem to remember find issues with the original implementation of 
CloseApplications with tray applications, might be worth making sure the new 
code doesn’t break anything (in my case it was a VB6 application!)

2.       What would happen if someone tried to kill a service? I can think of a 
good reason to do this but it might be worth checking the outcome.

Neil

From: Rob Mensching [mailto:r...@robmensching.com<mailto:r...@robmensching.com>]
Sent: 20 February 2013 20:20
To: Windows Installer XML toolset developer mailing list
Subject: [WiX-devs] RFC: CloseApps extension enhancements.

I was using CloseApplications from the WixUtilExtension recently and found I 
needed a bit more functionality than what is currently present.

Here's what I'm thinking about adding:

1. Add "EndSessionMessage" and "ElevatedEndSessionMessage" attributes - this 
will more mimic the Restart Manager behavior where a WM_QUERYENDSESSION then 
WM_ENDSESSION is sent. Those messages seem to be more in vogue that sending a 
WM_CLOSE these days. I'm not planning to do it exactly like RM where all apps 
are sent a query message before sending the end session messages. I'm just 
going to do each message back to back (unless the query says don't try to end). 
I'm doing this because I found some apps that got unhappy being told to close. 
I'm not married to those attribute names.

2. Add "TerminateProcess" attribute - this will act similar to the existing 
RebootMessage attribute but kill the process instead of scheduling a restart. 
Killing processes is generally a bad thing but I've run into a couple customers 
now that say that is the correct way to close their process that has no window. 
I'm not married to that attribute name but "KillProcess" seemed a little 
aggressive. <smile/>

3. (if I have time) Add a "Timeout" attribute - this will allow each 
CloseApplication element to change the default wait when doing a close. Right 
now the default is hardcoded to 5 seconds which seems reasonable, but if I have 
time, I thought I'd allow it to be configurable.

Any questions, concerns, suggestions?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
WiX-devs mailing list
WiX-devs@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:WiX-devs@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-devs

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
WiX-devs mailing list
WiX-devs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-devs

Reply via email to