On 02-Feb-14 21:57, Bruce Cran wrote: > On 2/2/2014 4:47 PM, Bob Arnson wrote: >> The biggest reason I'd suggest otherwise is that we ran into >> badly-diluted "Google juice" for a long time with v2 doc urls getting >> top ranking for years after v3.0 was released. I don't know if there's >> an SEO technique we could use to fix that. > Surely that could be solved with a few aliases - e.g. > http://docs.wixtoolset.org/{release, stable, current} where 'release' > could be the latest released version, 'stable' docs for the next point > release, and 'current' would be docs for the next major release. That would help. You're still spreading around your page ranking, though...Python blocks spiders from older and in-development doc sets.
> Or we could do as FreeBSD does with their man page interface, where > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=make.conf&sektion=5 - with no > version specified gives the latest released version (10.0-RELEASE at > this time) with users able to select other versions including the latest > development code. Yeah, MSDN does the same thing. For WiX, we'd have to handle that during doc-gen. It'll be tougher for v4 since the namespaces changed. I'm thinking we need both approaches sooner or later. -- sig://boB http://joyofsetup.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ WiX-devs mailing list WiX-devs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-devs
