On 20-Jan-15 14:19, Rob Mensching wrote: > We have light and lit today because C/C++ has link.exe/lib.exe. If someone > wanted to argue that we should get rid of lit.exe and just make light.exe the > tool that outputs build stuff, I could see that. Lit *is* different because > it doesn't do linking or binding which makes it different beastie... I'd rather have more, smaller tools than bigger tools with confusing modes.
> Okay. What do you mean "higher-level model"? We need to do lots of work in > the build .targets alone to span builds and such to support patching but I'm > not sure that's what you'd mean by "higher-level model". Maybe that's it. It's not clear to me how to fit together the torch+torch+torch+pyro model with what Melt does today. If it's all input into a set of targets that coordinates it all, maybe that works. That's not something the targets really do today (apart from the whole loc thing). But even then, I assume the targets would still wrap executables, so getting that right is a good thing. -- sig://boB http://joyofsetup.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet _______________________________________________ WiX-devs mailing list WiX-devs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-devs
