I find it still weird that we have two wmaker repros. What is that good for?
Applying a patch might not that easy. I send you the tarball, maybe you don't like it, so nothing goes wrong... There are some changes from Johann Haarhoff about resizing, which is actually my aim, see bug #15 which will conflict. Also, i plan some more complex resizing features, and sure a structure which makes stuff like this easier. 2009/12/6 Carlos R. Mafra <[email protected]> > On So 6.Dez'09 at 15:59:07 +0100, Andreas Gansen wrote: > > > > nice that someone get a bit closer to wmaker's code. I made also some > > changes, getopt (wm/wprefs) is working, the event-structure is more lean > and > > clean. At the moment i am working on the key/mouse handling, which is > really > > a mess. > > I would be interested in your cleanup patches. If you make them against > the git repo in http://repo.or.cz/w/wmaker-crm.git that will make > things easier for me. > > If you use git itself to generate the patch that is even better. > > > I think it's a good idea to delete XSMP support and i would also delete > > files like wsmap. There is a repository, so it makes no sense to keep the > > files. For the wanted functionality, i recommend bugs.windowmaker.infowith > > a proper hint to the deleted files at starting point. > > Yes, I will delete them. > > > What about LITE? I would like to have some opinions on that, i think it's > > really useless. I would rather clean up the code, and decide later, a > lite > > version. > > I already removed it back in August: > > > http://repo.or.cz/w/wmaker-crm.git/commit/fe736e849c9749e8c9f614166550e3eb84c8bba2 > > So please take a look at the git logs, maybe some things you want to do > were already done there. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected] > . >
