On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Tamas TEVESZ <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > > one thing, __wmessage is supposed to be private, really, but since > > there's no private wutil.h, and i'm not sure it makes sense at this > > point to have one, for a lack of a better idea, it's in wutil.h. > > > should it still be listed in the changelog? > > Hello, > > afaiu we have the choice of > either > a) wmessage/wwarning/etc. being macros that expand to __wmessage > AND __wmessage also being defined in a public header. (Which makes > it a public function) > or > b) wmessage/wwarning/etc. being wrapper *functions* that expanded > behind the scens to the non-public function __wmessage.
yeah, but *technically* we don't hide __wmessage() (at least not now). despite this, it really isn't supposed to be used directly. with that in mind, should the changing of its semantics be listed in news? i'm thinking, it might suggest funny ideas (using it or something). > I guess I am missing something, but I am no programmer. oh, no sweat. neither am i. does it not show? -- [-] mkdir /nonexistent -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
