Martin Dietze wrote: > > Thanks for your reply. But how about the first part of my > question? Carlos' repo contains lots of important bug fixes and > also new features which have been in use by many of us for a > while now. If we consider the 'next' branch 'unstable' and the > 'crm' branch 'testing' there still needs to be a timeframe for > integration into 'stable'. If this does not happen I see the > danger of (a) people simply abandoning WM, (b) developers and > distros simply forking their own versions of WM each with > different bug fixes and feature sets or (c) both of the above.
I'm behind on the integration. I have recently completed the various bugfixes. There's a pre2 tarball out there. http://windowmaker.org/pub/source/beta/WindowMaker-0.92.1pre2.tar.gz I'm currently running that codebase right now to look for additional bugs and quirks. Then I have to take a very hard look at the future directions. I'm hoping that when I take it as 0.92.1, that will generate interest in the project, including some new themes. > We are in a lucky situation to have an active community of > developers fixing bugs and contributing new features. But this > is nothing one should take for granted. I agree. -- John H. Robinson, IV [email protected] http (((( WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above, sbih.org ( )(:[ as apparently my cats have learned how to type. spiders.html (((( -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
