On Sun, 7 Aug 2011 at 7:00:35 +0300, Jason Brower wrote: > I feel there could be a vast number of improvements in windowmaker > because of technologies that didn't exist are not common place.
What do you think windowmaker should do that is not currently doing? > What would you say is the general direction of WindowMaker in terms > of this forked development. The main general direction is "stay stable and don't create surprises". Small improvements which do not disrupt the workflow people are already used to are also a possibility. What those things could be depend on the people out there and the patches they write. So the secondary general direction is "if you'd like to improve some area and write a patch, it will probably be accepted". People have already improved wmaker this way, e.g. someone (Johann Haarhoff) once thought that it would be nice to have a shortcut key for left/right maximization and _wrote_ a patch doing that. That was a nice non-disruptive wmaker-like improvement! Another direction is "code cleanups". If the code is well organized and easy to understand, it's easier to eventually add things to it. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
