On 17/11/2013 17:24, Christian wrote: > Hey guys, > > please calm down. :)
My reply. > Having code in github is a great idea. +1 > You can branch, make changes and submit your code via 'merge requests'. +1 > Anybody who is interested to see code changes should then add 'wmaker' > to his watch list. > Or try to get merge requests automatically mailed to the dev-mailing > list and everybody would be happy. +1 > I personally think it is an overhead to submit twice. Once as a merge > request to wmaker and second mailing it here too. > Or just post the link to the merge request here and discuss it. +1 > What do you think ? work twice don't make sense. > Cheers > Chris > > Am 17.11.2013 15:53, schrieb Carlos R. Mafra: >> On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 at 14:34:06 +0100, "Rodolfo García Peñas (kix)" wrote: >>> On 17/11/2013 13:44, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: >>>> On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 at 11:45:23 +0100, "Rodolfo García Peñas (kix)" wrote: >>>>> On 17/11/2013 9:37, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 at 23:39:18 +0100, Rodolfo García Peñas wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Carlos R. Mafra escribió: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I created a wmaker repository in github, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/crmafra/wmaker >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I will keep both the "old" repo.or.cz and the new github updated. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am testing it. I sent some patches. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please send the patches to the mailing list. >>>>> >>>>> But, If I sent the patches to the mail list, nothing changes. >>>> >>>> What do you mean by nothing changes? >>> >>> Nothing. My english is too bad, but you cannot understand the difference >>> between "you" and "we". Your project, our project. >> >> Again, wmaker is not "my" project. >> >> I guess my agreed-upon status is the "maintainer" of wmaker, just like >> you are the maintainer of the wmaker package in the Debian repository. >> >> Is the wmaker debian package _your_ project? Or do you consider yourself >> doing a service to others by being the maintainer of that code in the >> best possible way as to please the majority of Debian users? >> >> The maintainer status is not for life though. If people feel that >> I'm not capable for maintaining wmaker (for whatever reason) then we >> can start to discuss who the next maintainer should be and I get out. >> >>> https://github.com/thekix/wmaker >>> >>> I will upload my work there. If you think my code is ok for *your* >>> project, include it. >> >> But couldn't you in addition to the github request also send the patch >> to the mailing list too? >> >> This is what everybody (including you) is doing for the last 5 years and >> it's working fine. >> >> With this move I think you are actively trying to create problems in the >> established process of patch submission. >> >> I understand that you do want you want with your time, but if you don't >> send the patches to the wmaker-dev mailing list unfortunately they >> won't be included in the official repository. >> >> I hope you change your mind, you've made a lot of contributions already. >> >> > -- ||// //\\// Rodolfo "kix" Garcia ||\\// //\\ http://www.kix.es/ -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
