On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 03:28:05PM +0100, Steffen Liebergeld wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:47:42 +0100, "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> said:
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:43:27PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> >> Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > Why not installing 9base to /tmp/9 in your
> >> case?
> >> 
> >> because every reasonably sophisticated distribution cleans /tmp
> >> while the systems boot-procedures.
> 
> > I know, but doing cd $HOME/9base && sudo make install after each
> > reboot doesn't hurt much, if the system sucks. The only reason which
> > might hurt would be if /tmp is mounted with noexec option.
> 
> sudo is no option. At the moment the easiest thing is to use ratpoison
> and wait for better hardware (local and remote).

That is true, s/sudo//, and doing make 9PREFIX=/tmp/$USER/9
install might work though.

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe  ><><  www.ebrag.de  ><><  GPG key: 0D73F361

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii

Reply via email to