On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:43:15 +0100, "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 03:28:05PM +0100, Steffen Liebergeld wrote: >> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:47:42 +0100, "Anselm R. Garbe" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:43:27PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: >> >> Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > Why not installing 9base to /tmp/9 in >> your >> case? >> >> >> >> because every reasonably sophisticated distribution cleans /tmp >> >> while the systems boot-procedures. >> >> > I know, but doing cd $HOME/9base && sudo make install after each >> > reboot doesn't hurt much, if the system sucks. The only reason >> which > might hurt would be if /tmp is mounted with noexec option. >> >> sudo is no option. At the moment the easiest thing is to use >> ratpoison and wait for better hardware (local and remote).
> That is true, s/sudo//, and doing make 9PREFIX=/tmp/$USER/9 install > might work though. Sure. Thats an option, but it sucks ;-) -- Microsoft is simply one example of a proprietary software developer, a software developer that tries to subjugate users to keep them divided and helpless. -- Richard M. Stallman _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
