> Can we agree that we use different terminology? Because I can > fully follow what you proposed. You got it wrong what I mean > with ws. With ws I meant cached layout information of a specific > tag in use, though I can agree that creating such cached ws on > tag definition makes rarely sense, they can only created or > reused by request to keep the memory usage minimal.
Ok, yes, we agree now, I understood that you wanted to create the cached layout on tag creation, which made no sense to me(because some times you will never use it, and because you need on-the fly creation anyway for ones that have multiple tags. uriel
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
