Hi all Funny I was thinking about this a few minutes ago. Untill now I never had a client with more than one tag, but I like the idea, for example for my jabber clientm so that I would vote for keeping it.
Regards Hans On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:22:56PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > Hi there, > > I used the recent version for at least several weeks and noticed > that I never need any client containing more than a single tag. > > But handling stuff like 1+2+foobar in .../<client>/tags file, > means several overhead (for those who are familiar with the wmii > source code, the Frame struct has been invented esp. for this > reason). In other words, this overhead means several hundred > lines of code. > > Thus I propose, to only allow a tag per client. This would > result in something like a (it is really a superset if you think > further about it) workspace-alike approach, though it is more > simple than workspace handling, and we got already all > mechanisms to run specific classes/instances of clients in > specific tags. The overall concept won't change, except > disallowing tagging a client with more than one tag, and the > removal of * tag. > > I know that this is somewhat like the ws-approach, but I see no > need for the special complexity... > > Any concerns removing that? > > Regards, > -- > Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
