On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 11:02:52AM +0200, Stefan Tibus wrote: > > > > reason). In other words, this overhead means several hundred > > > lines of code. > > that's an argument > That's your point of view. To me it isn't.
wmii is a small and minimalistic WM, and that is good > > agree with it. even better, you can now again get rid of window bars as > > the only reason i saw for them was displaying the appropriate tag > Do you really have that small screens that you can't afford those > 16 pixels height per window? (If people don't like it, make it > configurable.) configurable would be OK. but that might result in more code again > To me it appears more useful to have window titles in their title bar what for? when you're in an xterm then you know that you're in an xterm and you don't need a bar to tell you. and for me, no matter how small/big my screen is a bar is always one more shell line > Whether you experience this yourself or not, there are circumstances > in which title bars are very useful to find the window I like to ok, might be > And in principle one could make more use of them (e.g. mouse and menu > driven tag changes or whatever). They're not just wasted space. actually, i dont need a mouse to select a win/client within a "normal" wmii-environment. _that_ is one of the main reasons for wmii (IMHO at least) > Minimalism and user-friendlyness do not always fit together... in wmii they do ;) tube -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://count0.net _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
