On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:32:08PM +0200, Denis Grelich wrote: > Hello all, > > I find it quite cumbersome that views that don't have any clients are > destroyed automatically. Firstly, it adds some unpredictability: you > don't know where you end up when your current view is destroyed. > Secondly, the current behaviour is quite annoying in that respect that > it forces me to re-type the tagname if I accidently destroyed a window > or if I want to remove a tag from a window but add another client to > that view. If a destroyed and recreated client is tagged by a rule, > the current behaviour forces me to go back to the view which is not > only ugly but also slows down the workflow considerably. Last but not > least, this behaviour was introduced as a means to add some > consistency to column behaviour, but actually, there is about zero > relation between clients and views? > > Please revert to the old behaviour.
At risk of writing a "me too" mail, I have to say I completely agree with Denis' points on this one... if only to add the weight of one extra opinion... The fact that I have to remember to add new clients before removing the old ones seems very clunky to me, although the main irritation is ending up in a view which quite probably has nothing to do with the task I'm currently engaged in. ~Chris. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
