* Sander van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-21 16:03]:
On 4/21/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that we can drop auto-destroying views and doing the
destroy when the 'view' command is invoked instead.
Being able to 'stay' on an empty view, but not being able to select a
random empty view, is inconsistent. I'm firmly against removing the
autodestroying of views, but if it was ever to happen, doing
xwrite /ctl view some_nonexisting_tag
should put you in the same situation as removing the last client of a
tag, for consistency's sake.
I see no problem/inconsistency in allowing to selet an empty view.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
