On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 03:37:50PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > I think that we can drop auto-destroying views and doing the > destroy when the 'view' command is invoked instead. I noticed, > that I often view a different tag after a view has been > auto-destroyed, thus I safe an additional interaction only > randomly (sometimes I really end in the view I wanted to end > after auto-destroy). Removing auto-destroy has the advantage > that we get more predictability, but in the general case I guess > that we don't need more interactions. On the other hand having > empty views might be misleading, because users could use views > like workspaces, which is not intented by the tagging mechanism.
It is out of question, that empty views will be destroyed if they aren't focused. At least that is definately a big difference to the classic workspace paradigm. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
