I'm not happy with the reasoning given by the judge, but here it is: "[U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick] ruled that Berg lacked standing to bring the case, saying any harm from an allegedly ineligible candidate was 'too vague and its effects too attenuated to confer standing on any and all voters.'
http://www.nj.com/newsflash/index.ssf?/base/politics-19/122496384585680.xml&storylist=topstories (Left unsaid in the judge's decision is that Berg is a whacko, bless his heart). _____________________________________________________ Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key [EMAIL PROTECTED] [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "World News Now Discussion List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wnndl?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
