A reader of the local Monterey County Herald today called the paper obviously pro-Obama for refusing to send a reporter to Kenya to track down the truth about Obama's birth. Hell, they barely send a reporter to Salinas.
What is the mecnanism for vetting a chandidate's absolutely required qualifications (not the more subjective ones like brans, degree of maverickness). After the election by Congress seems to be a tad late. Living on the fault line, mea culpa, mea culpa, Mary in Salinas, CA -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph Nebus Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 3:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [misc] that suit about Obama's birth... is thrown out (fwd) On Oct 26, 2008, at 10:46 AM, danny burstein wrote: > I'm not happy with the reasoning given by the judge, but here it is: I'm unsatisfied with it because I'd like to know who has got standing if The Voters or The Citizens don't, although I suppose if every single voter has got standing to sue that's inviting all sorts of frivolous and stupid attacks from the dingbats who think being liberal is equivalent to being a traitor or something like that. I guess electors might have standing or maybe the question of whether a presidential candidate meets the requirements of office has to be done by Congress when it counts the electoral votes. I don't suppose there are any useful precedents from when Horace Greeley tried to run for President on a combined Liberal Republican/Democrat/Deceased ticket. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "World News Now Discussion List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wnndl?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
