[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-28?page=comments#action_12415370 ] 

Lawrence Mandel commented on WODEN-28:
--------------------------------------

Are you reffering to the built in schema types? According to the WSDL 2.0 spec 
these are implicitly available for every WSDL document.

In what way does this hinder the use of the simple databinding framework?

> Un-necessary schema definition returned by Woden
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: WODEN-28
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-28
>      Project: Woden
>         Type: Bug

>     Reporter: Eran Chinthaka

>
> I was trying to read HotelReservationService.wsdl and feed that to Axis2. 
> When I tried to get the schemas within the wsdl, it returns two schema 
> instances. Actual wsdl contains only one schema.  But woden returns the 
> schema of XmlSchema (as I doubt) also, in addition to the schema in the wsdl, 
> when I call like this.
> TypesElement typesElement = description.toElement()
>                     .getTypesElement();
>             if (typesElement != null) {
>                 Schema[] schemas = typesElement.getSchemas();
>                 for (int i = 0; i < schemas.length; i++) {
>                     XmlSchema schemaDefinition = 
> schemas[i].getSchemaDefinition();
>                     ............................
>                     ............................                   
>                     
>                 }
>             }
> Is this intentional ? 
> I prefer if we can atleast have a switch for this, as this hinders me using 
> the simple databinding framework we have in Axis2. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to