[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-28?page=comments#action_12415395 ]
Lawrence Mandel commented on WODEN-28: -------------------------------------- If ADB doesn't support complex constructs, what will happen if complex constructs are used in inline or imported schemas? (Just trying to fully understand the requirements so we make the right decision.) > Un-necessary schema definition returned by Woden > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WODEN-28 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-28 > Project: Woden > Type: Bug > Reporter: Eran Chinthaka > > I was trying to read HotelReservationService.wsdl and feed that to Axis2. > When I tried to get the schemas within the wsdl, it returns two schema > instances. Actual wsdl contains only one schema. But woden returns the > schema of XmlSchema (as I doubt) also, in addition to the schema in the wsdl, > when I call like this. > TypesElement typesElement = description.toElement() > .getTypesElement(); > if (typesElement != null) { > Schema[] schemas = typesElement.getSchemas(); > for (int i = 0; i < schemas.length; i++) { > XmlSchema schemaDefinition = > schemas[i].getSchemaDefinition(); > ............................ > ............................ > > } > } > Is this intentional ? > I prefer if we can atleast have a switch for this, as this hinders me using > the simple databinding framework we have in Axis2. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
