Lawrence,
I believe if we have a good interop event Nov 14-18, then we can quickly exit CR and go to PR early in 2007, so we would be a Rec in June 2007.
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| "Jeremy Hughes"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/27/2006 04:44 AM
|
|
Hi, some comments in line ..
On 9/26/06, Lawrence Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Attendees: Lawrence Mandel, John Kaputin, Arthur Ryman, Jeremy Hughes,
> Graham Turrell
> Regrets: Oshani Seneviratne
>
> Minutes
>
> 1. Open Action Items - Lawrence Mandel
>
> 2006-09-12 - John to liaise with Chinthaka on when these will be available,
> how soon afterwards Woden M6 can be available and confirm that Axis2 will
> actually pick up this M6 release of Woden.
> 2006-09-26
> John: XmlSchema and Axiom have been released. M6 should be ready. I haven't
> received confirmation that Axis2 will bundle M6.
>
> 2006-09-12 - Arthur to check on W3C WSDL2 WG time frame for PR phase and
> next interop event and feedback to Woden community.
> 2006-09-26
> Arthur: November 13 is the tentative date for the interop event. The likely
> site is at Canon in France. PR timing looks like June.
I thought June was the potential 'recommendation' date
> John: Jonathan Marsh was going to check with Paul Downing to see if he's
> interested in participating in the interop event. One possibility is to do a
> couple days in the UK. Also, Sanjiva and Paul indicated they'd be interested
> in participating in a European interop event.
>
> 2006-09-12 - John to revise an M7 plan (based on original M6 plan),
> distribute, then try to finalize at next week's telecon.
> 2006-09-26
> John: I did a quick update on the milestone plan on the website. The M7 plan
> is the M6 plan with a couple items added at the bottom. URI resolver,
> removing DOM dependency and completing the Axiom implementation. Please
> comment.
> Arthur: Can we adjust the date for the interop event?
> John: Sure.
> Closed.
>
> 2006-09-12 - John to complete review of Oshani's code in WODEN-44
> 2006-09-26
> John: I've completed half. More to do.
>
> 2006-09-12 - ALL - review Jeremy's WODEN-40 branch.
> 2006-09-26
> John: I reviewed it after it was merged. Looks good to me.
> Arthur: Is there an easy way to compare the branch with the trunk?
> Jeremy: Yes. In Eclipse. Use compare.
BTW: WODEN-40 is now merged into the trunk. If you'd like to see the
diff you can either see the 4 SVN commit emails on the mail archive:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200609.mbox/date
(search for r447385)
>
> 2006-09-12 - John, or others, review Graham's WODEN-14 patch
> 2006-09-26
> Jeremy: I had a look. I spoke with Graham about putting a test together so
> we can easily test this enhancement.
> Graham: No update on the test yet.
>
> 2006-09-12 - John circulate his Telecon number for next weeks call.
> 2006-09-26
> Lawrence: This action is no longer applicable.
> Closed.
>
> Deferred, pending other actions:
>
> 2006-09-12 - John will update the M7 plan on the website once finalized.
> 2006-09-26
> John: Done.
> Closed.
>
> 2006-09-12 - John will add Oshani to the website's committers list when
> updating the M7 plan.
> John: Done.
> Closed.
>
> 2. Milestone (M6/M7) Status - John Kaputin
>
> Jeremy: Arthur found some NPEs.
> Arthur: I found two JUnit failures and a problem with the Ant task. I
> haven't had time to diagnose the source of the problem. I posted about the
> problems to the list.
> John: I think the problem is the test cases aren't in the W3C test case.
> Arthur: So the JUnit test suite probably doesn't test everything in the W3C
> test suite.
> Lawrence: Correct. It's hard coded. We discussed a dynamic way to extract
> and test the W3C test suite.
> [Action] Jeremy will investigate a method for testing the W3C test suite
> based on what he did with XmlSchema.
> John: In terms of time frame we either do an M6 with what we've got or fix
> the test cases and get the test suite up to date. The reason for doing M6 is
> to get Axis and up-to-date build.
> Arthur: I don't think there's anything wrong with declaring M6 now and
> fixing the few failures afterwards. We've got a very high pass rate.
> [Action] John will investigate the 2 Jiras Arthur's raised for the JUnit
> failures.
> Arthur: Do we have tests to contribute to the W3C?
> John: Yes. I've created some WSDL docs for the Woden test suite.
>
> John: According to the Apache process we need to sign our releases. I'm
> looking into this and if we'll need to do this for M6 or if we can postpone
> for M7.
>
> John: We have enough votes for M6. I'll start the incubator PMC approval
> after this call.
>
> 3.Development Discussion - All
>
> Jeremy: I posted to the list about splitting up the build. Please read and
> comment.
>
> John: There's a need to help complete the test suite. The working group page
> has a coverage report that shows what else needs to be covered.
> Arthur: We're pretty good about covering the elements and attributes. The
> bulk of the work going forward is to check the validator. We need two
> things: a test that violates each assertion and a check in Woden that
> catches the failure.
>
> Arthur: As a heads up, features and properties will likely be removed from
> the spec.
>
> 4. Other Business - Open
>
> No other business was raised.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lawrence Mandel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
