I'd like to see a concrete proposal for what Java 5 features we should use before we decide to cutover.
-- Arthur On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be good to investigate what we can do to improve the API > given that we can use Java 5 features such as generics. How about a > branch for that so that we can be as ready as possible when/if Axis2 > make the switch. > > Cheers, > Jeremy > > On 27/02/2008, Lawrence Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 > > > > Woden has also discussed a move to Java 5 and the dev team was in > favour > > of this move. As Axis2 depends on Woden we cannot consider this move > > unless Axis2 also moves. > > > > Lawrence > > > > > > > > > > > > Deepal Jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 02/26/2008 11:15 PM > > Please respond to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > To > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > cc > > > > Subject > > [Axis2] Moving Axis2 code base into JDK 1.5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all , > > > > As you might remember few months back Glen asked the list about moving > > to JDK 1.5 and I think we got very positive feedback. So I thought of > > asking again and change the code to work with JDK 1.5 . The main reason > > behind sending this mail is due the dependency we have for annogen. As > I > > can see that project is dead one and there is no development happening > > so I do not think it is a good idea to depend on such a project. In the > > meantime we have few issues with annogen as well ,first inner class > > problem (I have locally fixed that both in Axis2 and Annogen will > commit > > soon) , second is the final class problem. I request a release from > > annogen after the changes that Dims did , but we did not get any reply > > so far. > > > > We all know that we get better annotation support from JDK 1.5 so if we > > move to JDK 1.5 we can get rid of the annogen dependency and we can > just > > use JDK for annotation processing. Other problem is generic support , > > if we move to JDK 1.5 we can have generic support in our POJOs. In > > addition to POJO we can get better concurrent support in JDK 1.5 as > well. > > > > So if we move to JDK 1.5 we can get better support , and I do not think > > any advantage of staying in 1.4 . If some user want to use Axis2 in JDK > > 1.4 they can happily use Axis2 1.3 , which is very stable version and > > working fine in 1.4 and 1.5. > > > > If any user or developers have any concern on moving to JDK 1.5 please > > come forward and reply to this mail that will be very helpful for all > of > > us. > > > > Here is my +1 for moving to JDK 1.5 to and release Axis2 1.4 in JDK 1.5 > > > > Thank you, > > Deepal > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
