Hi Arthur, I was just proposing starting a branch to act as a sandbox
to experiment with Java 5 features that we might want to use. I don't
think we should cut over to Java 5 until Axis2 does. Even at that
point, we might not want to exploit Java 5, but it would be a good
opporunity to start something simple.

So, if anyone's interested then I'll start a branch (which can be
dumped later if we don't like it) and start a wiki page to summarise
where we might make use of Java 5 - certainly in the API, and maybe
internally.

Cheers,
Jeremy

On 27/02/2008, Arthur Ryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to see a concrete proposal for what Java 5 features we should use
> before we decide to cutover.
>
> -- Arthur
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > It would be good to investigate what we can do to improve the API
> > given that we can use Java 5 features such as generics. How about a
> > branch for that so that we can be as ready as possible when/if Axis2
> > make the switch.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jeremy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 27/02/2008, Lawrence Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > >  Woden has also discussed a move to Java 5 and the dev team was in
> favour
> > >  of this move. As Axis2 depends on Woden we cannot consider this move
> > >  unless Axis2 also moves.
> > >
> > >  Lawrence
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  Deepal Jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >  02/26/2008 11:15 PM
> > >  Please respond to
> > >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >  To
> > >  "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > >  "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >  cc
> > >
> > >  Subject
> > >  [Axis2] Moving Axis2 code base into JDK 1.5
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  Hi all ,
> > >
> > >  As you might remember few months back Glen asked the list about moving
> > >  to JDK 1.5 and I think we got very positive feedback. So I thought of
> > >  asking again and change the code to work with JDK 1.5 . The main reason
> > >  behind sending this mail is due the dependency we have for annogen. As
> I
> > >  can see that project is dead one and there is no development happening
> > >  so I do not think it is a good idea to depend on such a project. In the
> > >  meantime we have few issues with annogen as well ,first  inner class
> > >  problem (I have locally fixed that both in Axis2 and Annogen will
> commit
> > >  soon) , second is the final class problem. I request a release from
> > >  annogen after the changes that Dims did , but we did not get any reply
> > >  so far.
> > >
> > >  We all know that we get better annotation support from JDK 1.5 so if we
> > >  move to JDK 1.5 we can get rid of the annogen dependency and we can
> just
> > >  use JDK for annotation processing.  Other problem is generic support ,
> > >  if we move to JDK 1.5 we can have generic support in our POJOs.  In
> > >  addition to POJO we can get better concurrent support in JDK 1.5 as
> well.
> > >
> > >  So if we move to JDK 1.5 we can get better support , and I do not think
> > >  any advantage of staying in 1.4 . If some user want to use Axis2 in JDK
> > >  1.4 they can happily use Axis2 1.3 , which is very stable version and
> > >  working fine in 1.4 and 1.5.
> > >
> > >  If any user or developers have any concern on moving to JDK 1.5 please
> > >  come forward and reply to this mail that will be very helpful for all
> of
> > >  us.
> > >
> > >  Here is my +1 for moving to JDK 1.5 to and release Axis2 1.4 in JDK 1.5
> > >
> > >  Thank you,
> > >  Deepal
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to